From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CD7C433F5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8768061BFE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:41:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8768061BFE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:55562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmvuL-0007IB-Mj for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 05:41:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmvtg-0006Ty-N5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 05:41:04 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:33505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmvtd-000281-RD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 05:41:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637059260; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pLJuSDE5I4FFe5aVbF3Qc45HT5I6Uuq+NOTPa2SYe4Y=; b=X2IiVchuCXW+x9SoVYFFEsQlo78XSjbEau9EGcHLSDL73E6cE0v/3vkL+icYHuV0M0i2mk wtbqlJhE7hKbuwK5l69foUt+4VzJrsifIzoReWKevlUayl3kYVyZBFuTH9zqyTb8KqDHOL z+4yYDxAgWpIRp47NJ43TB5d42w0bDU= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-175-0LqPHf0FMK6c7OLLLvwGJA-1; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 05:40:58 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 0LqPHf0FMK6c7OLLLvwGJA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id p3-20020a056000018300b00186b195d4ddso4362406wrx.15 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:40:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pLJuSDE5I4FFe5aVbF3Qc45HT5I6Uuq+NOTPa2SYe4Y=; b=StrKDgBwL0nY7iEsNtAzUiknisvch/SgmiXZ9zkjG8GJq8xBBo+TCZvRDotvkOrG5B qBegfYbR8kXFpvt3X3qRI4aUMI7kRjtcjLyRIFJgI5mvCxGWcZzz5O46jsAQNIE7Dh1a am1/1jQfhwVXi33yL3akCUuBEGNHT9ws9RGXcf1/oueVDfMM0hiIXQGH+46C/D0mTcQX n2tbS7F3g2z5yCgR6yt/b6s4TQTE01iuTmmuv53wjLD35iOco1DYsa1/wx6LgXlSrt4o FhY1MHfBdkTGZCV9Q81EFovIFuF59eDoeUXN/BH5z4mzY9pqxzR/Rr1jPlXhbJzZaU2N lk6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GjFuK4E9xr1X/RZMunknTdk6xDaQNqFOXjJheatgDvI2p6OUI fNbOef4C2cZg5Dyp/XKPEDTQmnu+GuzvBdrRU0L4Cwwcln+T3kLdIYJcHuhQCN9U2LhQ9Vy6MFC sazoAybN3e8cZpbo= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c010:: with SMTP id c16mr6513962wmb.141.1637059257728; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:40:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvglWxE9EXqQWZZgmBkHPdafGkmGYIviLI+JD/hDRa4bRtl2mWJj69O2guLAHb+SOdRglQ4A== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c010:: with SMTP id c16mr6513939wmb.141.1637059257554; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.238] (85.red-95-127-186.staticip.rima-tde.net. [95.127.186.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w4sm5156254wrs.88.2021.11.16.02.40.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:40:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <06f45f57-c034-7286-cb89-358272938e3b@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:40:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: Cirrus-CI all red To: Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= References: <701011ce-8bc1-9e93-82ed-a4d72c70b2da@redhat.com> <4e540821-9bc2-77b5-ad70-ebc5df53e039@redhat.com> <87fss5k1lv.fsf@linaro.org> <938ec78f-1ca1-f3df-26be-790e53d9cc7e@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= In-Reply-To: <938ec78f-1ca1-f3df-26be-790e53d9cc7e@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=philmd@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -48 X-Spam_score: -4.9 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.697, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.446, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Yonggang Luo , Ed Maste , Li-Wen Hsu , qemu-devel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 11/16/21 10:15, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 09/11/2021 12.32, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 11:27:42AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes: [...] >>> It seems to be triggering the builds now although GitLab still reports >>> failures for some other reason now. >> >> The cirrus-run image we're using is lockde to version 0.3.0. I'm >> testing an update to version 0.5.0 which has various reliability >> fixes, essentially around making it retry on transient errors. > > We should maybe also simply bump the timeout for the cirrus jobs ... > sometimes they get delayed and just need a little bit more than 60 > minutes to finish ... so would it be OK to us 70 or 80 minutes here? Sounds a good idea, this would be more useful that what we have now.