From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC407C47082 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728436139A for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:10:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 728436139A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.132567.247218 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llvAQ-0002lr-VL; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:54 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 132567.247218; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llvAQ-0002lk-SG; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:54 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 132567; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:53 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llvAP-0002lZ-IQ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:53 +0000 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.28]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 21b8d34e-57f5-4826-9a3f-41e77e0fbd84; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.suse.de (imap-alt.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.47]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6C0218D0; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from director2.suse.de (director2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.72]) by imap.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7D2611A98; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:09:51 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 21b8d34e-57f5-4826-9a3f-41e77e0fbd84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1622041791; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QLZ+/VjMHIzSsHqjlYN8Qsxcpte4s5NfwIoid2vqaKM=; b=f07cChPWTGvSF0haladmTLDgs5659K2fRbC4m2DSOrS4YAMTE2T92xPnqlgs5+sEAGuoNy VW83GIOgQGunfEhAxyceHT9MJTijTHmlvoXfEozl0AeAfU6iT3AUGpqfmpQCNJDHctTFBE rQIgGKIBYeV1GcWE91ImJ6XM8iHRGyU= Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] cpufreq: Allow restricting to internal governors only To: Jason Andryuk Cc: xen-devel References: <20210503192810.36084-1-jandryuk@gmail.com> <20210503192810.36084-2-jandryuk@gmail.com> <927b886a-9b0c-2162-763b-9c2147227b8c@suse.com> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <0701d667-b8f6-5691-5a40-e0e8eff0debb@suse.com> Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 17:09:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26.05.2021 16:12, Jason Andryuk wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:18 AM Jan Beulich wrote: >> Sorry, all quite nit-like remarks, but still ... > > It's fine. Would a design session be useful to discuss hwp? Is there anything beyond patch review that's necessary there? I'm also not really set up to usefully join design sessions, I'm afraid. Jan