From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8168CC433F5 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 11:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241014AbiARLo0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 06:44:26 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:37752 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236427AbiARLoP (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 06:44:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1642506255; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8U3jGh8wUjHRYKJpJBPp8vZAQ/5jxuWNA7E7/BWluDg=; b=WnEc6rPKrnXBmdh6mt26i/gnR50ucrNyfZjKWduhJOW7jSdVxeFumuWNoNCpgXOBf7sNKV zZT5Be1GkGQ4qPRj7AgycEoJiIsMyUf7DYA8zQMsUDi9t0cqOpui1dp4DlfT3QLTfJiWf5 PeVW8G6c7c1zm0WR6Z6P1JY+H7QezSE= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-588-V4jlgDatNmK7Xj5fNxsOOg-1; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 06:44:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: V4jlgDatNmK7Xj5fNxsOOg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v185-20020a1cacc2000000b0034906580813so1657164wme.1 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 03:44:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8U3jGh8wUjHRYKJpJBPp8vZAQ/5jxuWNA7E7/BWluDg=; b=zjK5P5RaVydOVyz2bnA/anCZ2D4brYvTBdcrW7bPgb9HvCO7xuBcIZaD/9tkW9P0Mr 3Y+u0/8DT36lBZlRFLfWzsS2xG7863mahjYya18f0FAMsEe0QwZIQ/i+SZgA5AVQAc7P GpQENi7FqzAG04u1WiR2bPvmK3e3LqP5V4r0sVRrVSthv49RGT2fePsuWDCEcOPOkr6B Rg/9ms72z71gi6GoOxSTxszSkqe5Mm/K+7Vxh3ErKjuRpLXi98XMSs6sRsZ7gkny0isf L2O3SSoLgmgrbjt5etJD6zcELKvZBa9nx+RpAxT5lghMVjfsaLkZ45kWEQslUqYYi/rO hgDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KUHJbKXRDGx+Pdp36vPvMJtj6rhTzVHeqWtaA++WEXgY8Jjgl 80D3ULCD89pB3KDkFbQL5WwHyu6X5o4tReH46XgNgNKuC0rz8kizv7NMAVJLLU7HJIUqtoOpDgW RPcKLK+JtDx8nef3AFzHnswfZ X-Received: by 2002:a1c:19c1:: with SMTP id 184mr31261631wmz.61.1642506252864; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 03:44:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyD4snZ3GPjXyCXaZbanPrNUOhbLbnXgN4NvXzdfnk1YTr19HNCsUmm/J3AjYWPohJ93Xh+QA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:19c1:: with SMTP id 184mr31261606wmz.61.1642506252638; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 03:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m20sm2390928wms.4.2022.01.18.03.44.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 03:44:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <073cdc28-6dbb-a2d1-ee1b-f3b53d5b7c81@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:44:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: avoid warning on s390 in mark_page_dirty Content-Language: en-US To: Christian Borntraeger , dwmw2@infradead.org Cc: butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, Cornelia Huck , Janosch Frank , David Hildenbrand , linux-s390 , Thomas Huth , Claudio Imbrenda References: <20220113122924.740496-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> <14380a1b-669f-8f0f-139b-7c89fabd4276@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/18/22 09:53, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> >>> Paolo, are you going to pick this for next for the time being? >>> >> >> Yep, done now. >> >> Paolo > > Thanks. I just realized that Davids patch meanwhile landed in Linus > tree. So better > take this via master and not next. Yeah, I understood what you meant. :) In fact, "master" right now is still on 5.16 (for patches that are destined to stable, but have conflicts merge window changes; those are pushed to master and merged from there into next). There will be another pull request this week and it will have this patch. > Maybe also add > Fixes: 2efd61a608b0 ("KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without > an active vCPU") > in case the patch is picked for stable Ok, will do. Paolo