From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1761450AbcLRT3q (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:29:46 -0500
Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:35638 "EHLO
        mail-oi0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1757273AbcLRT3o (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:29:44 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Remove no longer used second struct cont
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
References: <1481806438-30185-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
 <20161215162336.GA18152@pathway.suse.cz>
 <20161216013706.GA20445@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <CA+55aFz3B2BfjG54z7ALOwezCHSdQp+YbFaHcJkCg=fzoKtfNg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From: Scott Matheina <scott@matheina.com>
Message-ID: <07cb49cf-857b-1aa0-16e3-f9f06083dcc0@matheina.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:29:42 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFz3B2BfjG54z7ALOwezCHSdQp+YbFaHcJkCg=fzoKtfNg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 12/15/2016 07:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote:
>> basically I'm talking about a bunch of 80-cols fixups.
> Please don't.
>
> Nobody uses a vt100 terminal any more. The 80-column wrapping is
> excessive, and makes things like "grep" not work as well.
>
> No, we still don't want excessively long lines, but that's generally
> mainly because
>
>   (a) we don't want to have excessively _complicated_ lines
>
>   (b) we don't want to have excessively deep indentation (so if line
> length is due to 4+ levels of indentation, that's usually the primary
> problem).
>
>   (c) email quoting gets iffier and uglier, so short lines always are
> preferred if possible
>
> but in general, aside from those concerns, a long legible line is
> generally preferred over just adding line breaks for the very
> _occasional_ line.
>
> At the 100-column mark you almost have to break, because at that point
> people may start to be actually limited by their displays, but 80
> columns generally isn't it.
>
> In fact, I thought we already upped the check-patch limit to 100?
checkpatch.pl line 50
my $max_line_length = 80;

Not changed as of yet.
>
>                Linus