From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:54:52 +0000 Message-ID: <088c65d6-e709-23dd-3a86-e90e192fd30f@intel.com> References: <20170112191212.22710-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDDE5A29 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:55:57 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20170112191212.22710-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/12/2017 7:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Really trivial patches. Patches are not in patchwork, and not in the mail list. > > I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK > project to merge trivial maintaince patches. > > Stephen Hemminger (2): > bnx: make eth_dev_ops const > ena: make eth_dev_ops const > > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c | 2 +- Right, ena and bnxt are missing const for eth_dev_ops. Do you want me send patches? > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >