From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:41:48 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2018.11 delayed a day In-Reply-To: <20181113113326.1a328b0b@xps13> References: <20181112214016.GS11247@bill-the-cat> <8668e5b6-00a7-0ebb-8910-b9dd8dabf81b@gmail.com> <20181112222515.GU11247@bill-the-cat> <64cad1b6-99d6-f692-4b9f-aced8fd86fb5@gmail.com> <20181113011247.GV11247@bill-the-cat> <1f09ec2c-d2e6-0e83-541b-5e43fc736f41@gmail.com> <20181113113326.1a328b0b@xps13> Message-ID: <08bc9e78-1b67-1100-db62-dac7d6a89802@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 11/13/2018 11:33 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Marek, >=20 > +Jagan >=20 > Marek Vasut wrote on Tue, 13 Nov 2018 03:12:49 > +0100: >=20 >> On 11/13/2018 02:12 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:03:41AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: =20 >>>> On 11/12/2018 11:25 PM, Tom Rini wrote: =20 >>>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:13:29PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: =20 >>>>>> On 11/12/2018 10:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote: =20 >>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since Jagan promise a v2 SPI PR for some build fixes that we should= have >>>>>>> in the release and I believe didn't get them out before the end of = his >>>>>>> day, I'm letting everyone know now to expect the release tomorrow >>>>>>> instead, thanks! =20 >>>>>> >>>>>> Will anyone have any chance to test those fixes to verify they didn't >>>>>> break anything ? =20 >>>>> >>>>> Since they're obvious enough by inspection, I'm not worried about it.= =20 >>>> >>>> Which patches are those ? =20 >>> >>> The ones in question? =20 >> >> Yes, is there a list ? >=20 > I think this is the branch: > https://github.com/openedev/u-boot-amarula/commits/v2-WIP5 Ugh, patchwork links would be nice. But for example https://github.com/openedev/u-boot-amarula/commit/91d8f9979420827942ca1f336= df36504bd2c1943 is quite inobvious, and I think buggy ... else if (env_get_f("mtdparts", tmp_parts, sizeof(tmp_parts) !=3D -1)) sizeof(tmp_parts) !=3D -1 will always be true. > And the successful Travis builds: > https://travis-ci.org/openedev/u-boot-amarula/builds/453885472 >=20 >> >>>>>> I believe this is yet another manifestation of the problems of the 2 >>>>>> month release cycle, which I think is too short and stressful. =20 >>>>> >>>>> And I believe that's a red herring. All the same I am still consider= ing >>>>> changes. =20 >>>> >>>> I'd really like to know how do other maintainers feel about this 2 mon= th >>>> release cycle vs. for example 3 month like Linux does. I think the lat= er >>>> is about right, 2 months is too short. =20 >>> >>> Yes, I've asked before and there's a few people in the same camp as you, >>> and there's a few people who like 2 months, and there's a large number >>> of no strong opinions. That's why I'm still thinking about changing >>> things again. =20 >> >> Maybe we need a poll ? >=20 > I do agree on this. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Miqu=C3=A8l >=20 --=20 Best regards, Marek Vasut