From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids (Kernel)
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:12:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08df0d66-ae21-6e52-cef6-c003db0b75b2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YBgQoWRxpyoHDsmp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2/1/2021 9:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I made the below changes, does that work?
Yes, it works well.
Thanks,
Kan
>
> ---
>
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3627,6 +3627,15 @@ static int core_pmu_hw_config(struct per
> return intel_pmu_bts_config(event);
> }
>
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX (INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING + \
> + ((x86_pmu.num_topdown_events - 1) << 8))
> +
> +static bool is_available_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + return is_metric_event(event) &&
> + event->attr.config <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool is_mem_loads_event(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> return (event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == X86_CONFIG(.event=0xcd, .umask=0x01);
> @@ -3711,7 +3720,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct pe
> if (event->attr.config & X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (is_metric_event(event)) {
> + if (is_available_metric_event(event)) {
> struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
>
> /* The metric events don't support sampling. */
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -87,7 +87,14 @@ static inline bool is_topdown_count(stru
> return event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN;
> }
>
> -static inline bool is_metric_event(struct perf_event *event);
> +static inline bool is_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + u64 config = event->attr.config;
> +
> + return ((config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT) == 0) &&
> + ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) >= INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING) &&
> + ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_MAX);
> +}
>
> static inline bool is_slots_event(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> @@ -901,18 +908,6 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_ht_attr ev
> struct pmu *x86_get_pmu(void);
> extern struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
>
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX (INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING + \
> - ((x86_pmu.num_topdown_events - 1) << 8))
> -
> -static inline bool is_metric_event(struct perf_event *event)
> -{
> - u64 config = event->attr.config;
> -
> - return ((config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT) == 0) &&
> - ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) >= INTEL_TD_METRIC_RETIRING) &&
> - ((config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) <= INTEL_TD_METRIC_AVAILABLE_MAX);
> -}
> -
> static __always_inline struct x86_perf_task_context_opt *task_context_opt(void *ctx)
> {
> if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -284,10 +284,12 @@ struct x86_pmu_capability {
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BAD_SPEC 0x8100 /* Bad speculation metric */
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_FE_BOUND 0x8200 /* FE bound metric */
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BE_BOUND 0x8300 /* BE bound metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_HEAVY_OPS 0x8400 /* Heavy Operations metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BR_MISPREDICT 0x8500 /* Branch Mispredict metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_FETCH_LAT 0x8600 /* Fetch Latency metric */
> -#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_MEM_BOUND 0x8700 /* Memory bound metric */
> +/* Level 2 metrics */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_HEAVY_OPS 0x8400 /* Heavy Operations metric */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_BR_MISPREDICT 0x8500 /* Branch Mispredict metric */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_FETCH_LAT 0x8600 /* Fetch Latency metric */
> +#define INTEL_TD_METRIC_MEM_BOUND 0x8700 /* Memory bound metric */
> +
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_MAX INTEL_TD_METRIC_MEM_BOUND
> #define INTEL_TD_METRIC_NUM 8
>
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -908,7 +908,6 @@ enum perf_event_type {
> * u32 var1_dw;
> * } && PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT
> * #endif
> - *
> * }
> * }
> * { u64 data_src; } && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC
> @@ -1276,29 +1275,23 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
> reserved:40;
> };
>
> -#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> union perf_sample_weight {
> __u64 full;
> +#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> struct {
> __u32 var1_dw;
> __u16 var2_w;
> __u16 var3_w;
> };
> -};
> -
> #elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> -
> -union perf_sample_weight {
> - __u64 full;
> struct {
> __u16 var3_w;
> __u16 var2_w;
> __u32 var1_dw;
> };
> -};
> -
> #else
> #error "Unknown endianness"
> #endif
> +};
>
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 22:40 [PATCH V3 0/5] perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids (Kernel) kan.liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT kan.liang
2021-01-29 17:25 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-04 14:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-02-04 15:24 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-05 10:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-02-05 13:45 ` Liang, Kan
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_update_topdown_event() kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] perf/x86/intel: Filter unsupported Topdown metrics event kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/x86/intel: Add perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-01-28 22:40 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] perf/x86/intel: Support CPUID 10.ECX to disable fixed counters kan.liang
2021-02-02 11:57 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-02-01 14:30 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids (Kernel) Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-01 16:12 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08df0d66-ae21-6e52-cef6-c003db0b75b2@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.