From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sco-tester: Update ECONNABORTED to EOPNOTSUPP From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <1376062977-1497-1-git-send-email-frederic.dalleau@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 08:53:37 -0700 Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <09231CA6-E5F3-453E-9479-68F08072893A@holtmann.org> References: <1376062977-1497-1-git-send-email-frederic.dalleau@linux.intel.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Dalleau?= Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Fred, > Kernel interface has evolved in between. > --- > tools/sco-tester.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/sco-tester.c b/tools/sco-tester.c > index 70b8a5d..1e8351f 100644 > --- a/tools/sco-tester.c > +++ b/tools/sco-tester.c > @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static const struct sco_client_data connect_success = { > }; > > static const struct sco_client_data connect_failure = { > - .expect_err = ECONNABORTED > + .expect_err = EOPNOTSUPP > }; can we please have a proper thread on what error is appropriate to send from a socket interface when this situation happens. I see that we are flipping errors, but my request to discuss this gets ignored. Please look for a good reference of the error code usage in other socket protocols or manpages Regards Marcel