From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757319Ab3ENMgr (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 08:36:47 -0400 Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:21433 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756701Ab3ENMgo (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 08:36:44 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee68f-b7f436d000000f81-8e-51922fdaf69c From: Kukjin Kim To: "'Viresh Kumar'" , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" Cc: robin.randhawa@arm.com, "'Ben Dooks'" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com References: <5176A807.2090005@samsung.com> <105283277.osOpfTKkgk@vostro.rjw.lan> In-reply-to: Subject: RE: [PATCH 07/18] cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 21:36:42 +0900 Message-id: <093901ce509f$afe92f40$0fbb8dc0$%kim@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Ac5PxyGIq7zsLFFjR4KpAQS0H8YeIQA2DKwg Content-language: ko X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprIKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t8zQ91b+pMCDTbdE7J43T2b1WLSugNM Fht7PrNbPG36wW7x/tAzZotNj6+xWlzeNYfN4nPvEUaLGef3MVkcWNrOYjHl8BcWi/6FvUwW nw/vYrdYe/cpUO9XDwd+jzXz1jB6/F31gtnjzrU9bB6bl9R73P73mNnj0eIWRo/Pm+QC2KO4 bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mq5fbmYsuMJSsWjSEdYGxtPMXYwcHBICJhKnrtd3MXICmWISF+6tZ+ti 5OIQEljGKPFu2xwmiISJxLvDvcwQiemMEvtmT2AHSQgJ/GWUWHFKGsRmE9CQOPz+GVhcRCBY 4uH+VrBJzAI/mSRW/DkD1T2RSeLyumPMIFWcQFW7WhcygZwhLBAqsfuMKUiYRUBVYtLsC6wg Nq+ArcT53lvMELagxI/J91hAbGYBLYn1O48zQdjyEpvXvIX6Rl3i0V9diBuMJDatfskKUSIi se/FO0aQEyQEtnBIbPn+hxlil4DEt8mHWCB6ZSU2HWCGeFhS4uCKGywTGCVmIdk8C8nmWUg2 z0KyYgEjyypG0dSC5ILipPQiY73ixNzi0rx0veT83E2MkOTQv4Px7gHrQ4zJQOsnMkuJJucD k0teSbyhsZmRhamJqbGRuaUZacJK4rxqLdaBQgLpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOanFhxiZODilGhjr ZXjU7zXn1DGmvL0rfev63dQs2QTH0JaYxpUxh3leL2DcOPFm4+aTmkk/2zbsLnI4v9s7q0Cs f96tg1W/cm9tORg0da7nwZzvDxcXP0y7MX1e60X9qGM2Yr0tSTfuuqZ8ZLjk/vr7ugss/fL/ zuzrsvC+1PhI2mihw/y1G69yh7xYv+N63vqpSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAz+xGsiQDAAA= X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrPKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jQd1b+pMCDdZv4bV43T2b1WLSugNM Fht7PrNbPG36wW7x/tAzZotNj6+xWlzeNYfN4nPvEUaLGef3MVkcWNrOYjHl8BcWi/6FvUwW nw/vYrdYe/cpUO9XDwd+jzXz1jB6/F31gtnjzrU9bB6bl9R73P73mNnj0eIWRo/Pm+QC2KMa GG0yUhNTUosUUvOS81My89JtlbyD453jTc0MDHUNLS3MlRTyEnNTbZVcfAJ03TJzgO5WUihL zCkFCgUkFhcr6dthmhAa4qZrAdMYoesbEgTXY2SABhLWMWZcv9zMWHCFpWLRpCOsDYynmbsY OTkkBEwk3h3uhbLFJC7cW8/WxcjFISQwnVFi3+wJ7CAJIYG/jBIrTkmD2GwCGhKH3z8Di4sI BEs83N8K1sAs8JNJYsWfM8wQ3ROZJC6vOwY2lhOoalfrQqYuRg4OYYFQid1nTEHCLAKqEpNm X2AFsXkFbCXO995ihrAFJX5MvscCYjMLaEms33mcCcKWl9i85i0zyBgJAXWJR391IW4wkti0 +iUrRImIxL4X7xgnMArNQjJpFpJJs5BMmoWkZQEjyypG0dSC5ILipPRcQ73ixNzi0rx0veT8 3E2M4OTzTGoH48oGi0OMAhyMSjy8DXUTA4VYE8uKK3MPMUpwMCuJ8F7mnhQoxJuSWFmVWpQf X1Sak1p8iDEZ6NGJzFKiyfnAxJhXEm9obGJmZGlkZmFkYm5OmrCSOO+BVutAIYH0xJLU7NTU gtQimC1MHJxSDYydjhbp0/IU9/dMmGP854HSw5AgttKjIuXib9U1nTmO2AarrImzeZV42VJm Z5LOYg8vdd3zkisvh28r+SDd4VI8oS+wqLtC1kf4yoKTH99/e9x28hx/qt7LlhOsVeGt7Dwr GLMEzzvKn3i7WfT9iW/K89x1Ty/JEV+h8kqf/4Ibf53D8jMah5VYijMSDbWYi4oTAWKt7seC AwAA DLP-Filter: Pass X-MTR: 20000000000000000@CPGS X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on > top > > of current linux-next. > > I have already done that (attached). But i wasn't sure what Kukjin wants > as > he may report conflicts again and i will ask the same question for 3.12 :) > Since this missed last time, this would be sent to upstream via samsung tree again. It means the conflicts should be handled by myself. Rafael, if you don't mind, let me take this into Samsung tree for v3.11. - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 21:36:42 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 07/18] cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq In-Reply-To: References: <5176A807.2090005@samsung.com> <105283277.osOpfTKkgk@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: <093901ce509f$afe92f40$0fbb8dc0$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on > top > > of current linux-next. > > I have already done that (attached). But i wasn't sure what Kukjin wants > as > he may report conflicts again and i will ask the same question for 3.12 :) > Since this missed last time, this would be sent to upstream via samsung tree again. It means the conflicts should be handled by myself. Rafael, if you don't mind, let me take this into Samsung tree for v3.11. - Kukjin