From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: stsp <stsp2@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: dosemu and accessibility
Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 23:34:32 +0300
Message-ID: <09c1150b-34ee-9973-fd39-0fea400ad132@yandex.ru>
References: <alpine.NEB.2.23.451.2103290438590.1558@panix1.panix.com>
 <b4cc9e03-9907-4f40-c7cc-e3503c0bc274@gmail.com>
 <alpine.NEB.2.23.451.2103301551530.1765@panix1.panix.com>
 <31a90afb-a8f4-9954-375f-701214fe49d5@gmail.com>
 <alpine.NEB.2.23.451.2103310811170.1620@panix1.panix.com>
 <9fa060fc-a7cc-8ee1-a1cc-112a56a458c8@gmail.com>
 <alpine.NEB.2.23.451.2105021413570.8459@panix1.panix.com>
 <0185164d-0b21-2978-21ae-dc0a431489ea@yandex.ru>
 <alpine.NEB.2.23.451.2105021624020.17337@panix1.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1619987674;
        bh=ywerEqQgkci3y/QFfsAV96MimGotMARVc8L5Sn+X17M=;
        h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID:Cc;
        b=Kayjx4ymp4Pexvd7VgsMB8YkmlPtroLSKxuMnStfRZLhkTphkhYzyF32RCPnBRu15
         yrSpCSkky6vYbCkEgdMS8ZPBp68o2F5c87qVL0xqtpuXWgv6/vZWdO/IpikDZz3zfi
         6AmY150Xq9nikbLDnUNAZdwmPz8ul/VM5ZP4Pu3w=
In-Reply-To: <alpine.NEB.2.23.451.2105021624020.17337@panix1.panix.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-ID: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
To: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com>, Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org

02.05.2021 23:26, Jude DaShiell пишет:
> Have we got any disadvantages building for an i386 system if this and what
> it builds will most of the time be running on faster hardware than i386?

It will be running under dosemu2
rather than directly on hardware,
so that's fine. dosemu2 doesn't
yet properly support higher instruction
sets, for example the CMOV instructions
may not work in some configurations.