Re: [PATCH] serial: tegra: Map the iir register to default defines

From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: tegra: Map the iir register to default defines
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:37:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0DEBCDAD-C7D3-4DB9-B5F5-408951165662@schinagl.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9eed3c8e-a7af-1e1f-659a-a092a89d1679@nvidia.com>

Hey Jon,

On March 30, 2017 3:42:19 PM CEST, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>On 29/03/17 19:48, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>> The tegra serial IP seems to be following the common layout and the
>> interrupt ID's match up nicely. Replace the magic values to match the
>> common serial_reg defines, with the addition of the Tegra unique End
>of
>> Data interrupt.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
>> ---
>> Note I do not own any tegra hardware and just noticed it while
>working on my
>> somewhat related previous patch,
>> "serial: Do not treat the IIR register as a bitfield"
>> 
>> As such, this patch can only be applied after the aforementioned
>patch or the
>> iir variable will not have its mask applied yet.
>
>Nit-pick. If this is the case, then this should really be part of a
>patch series so it is obvious to everyone that this should only be
>applied after the other patch.
Yes, and it was, but I did not want to have the really big list of names in this much smaller group.
>
>Cheers
>Jon

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.