All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: plan splitting the ethdev ops struct
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:13:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a105584-532f-87cd-edf9-5dd1f35e2c2b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fa55af2-1a9b-d9b7-80a0-2a55a9b8468b@solarflare.com>

On 2/25/2020 3:51 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 2/25/20 3:44 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> For the ABI compatibility it is better to hide internal data structures
>> from the application as much as possible. But because of some inline
>> functions 'struct eth_dev_ops' can't be hidden completely.
>>
>> Plan is to split the 'struct eth_dev_ops' into two as ones used by
>> inline functions and ones not used, and hide the second part that not
>> used by inline functions completely to the application.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>> Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
>>
>> v2:
>> * Add target date for the work
>> * Give more detail on what will be done
>> ---
>>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 11 +++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> index 99d81564a..ff612a615 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> @@ -86,6 +86,17 @@ Deprecation Notices
>>    In 19.11 PMDs will still update the field even when the offload is not
>>    enabled.
>>  
>> +* ethdev: Split the ``struct eth_dev_ops`` struct to hide it as much as possible.
>> +  Currently the ``struct eth_dev_ops`` struct is accessible by the application
>> +  because some inline functions, like ``rte_eth_tx_descriptor_status()``,
>> +  access the struct directly. The struct will be separate in two, the ops used
>> +  by inline functions still will be accessible to user but rest will be hidden.
>> +  Initial split will be done in 20.05 with adding reserved fields for the struct
>> +  used by inline functions, and by putting new struct reference into public one
>> +  to not increase the size of ``struct rte_eth_dev``, proper split will be done
>> +  in 20.11 by moving inline dev_ops function to next to Rx/Tx burst functions and
>> +  hiding rest.
>> +
>>  * cryptodev: support for using IV with all sizes is added, J0 still can
>>    be used but only when IV length in following structs ``rte_crypto_auth_xform``,
>>    ``rte_crypto_aead_xform`` is set to zero. When IV length is greater or equal
> 
> I'd like to understand why do we need an intermediate solution first.

We don't need it really, we may prefer to postpone the update to 20.11.

> Also rereading above few times I've failed to fully understand what
> will be done and why it does not break API/ABI.
> 

Agree it wasn't very clear, but I mean something like below, I hope it clarifies:

Previously:

struct rte_eth_dev

+--------+
|        |    *dev_ops    struct eth_dev_ops
|        |
|        +-------------->+--------+
|        |               |        |
|        |               |        |
|        |               |        |
|        |               |        |
+--------+               |        |
                         |        |
                         |        |
                         |        |
                         +--------+


Proposed:

struct rte_eth_dev

+--------+
|        |                struct eth_dev_ops
|        |
|*dev_ops+-------------->+--------+
|        |               |        |
|        |               | Reserv |
|        |               |        |
|        |               |        |
+--------+               |        |
                         +--------+
                         | inline |
                         | de^_ops|               struct eth_dev_ops
                         +--------+
                         | *priv  +------------->+--------+
                         +--------+              |        |
                                                 |        |
                                                 |        |
                                                 |        |
                                                 |        |
                                                 |        |
                                                 |        |
                                                 |        |
                                                 +--------+

This is only to keep ABI compatibility [1] while separating the struct.

[1]
- The offset of some functions in the dev_ops struct should be same
- The size of the "struct rte_eth_dev" should be same

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-25 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-17 15:38 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: plan splitting the ethdev ops struct Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-18  5:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-02-25 12:42   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-26 13:01   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-18  6:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-02-21 10:40   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-25 10:35     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-02-25 11:07       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-02-25 11:19         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-02-25 12:28       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-25 12:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-25 15:51   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-02-25 16:13     ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-02-25 16:41       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-02-25 18:13   ` David Marchand
2020-02-25 18:18     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-03-04  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-24 23:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-25  9:11       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-05-26 13:55         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-25 10:24     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a105584-532f-87cd-edf9-5dd1f35e2c2b@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.