* cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch
@ 2020-05-02 10:27 Yang Yingliang
2020-05-05 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yang Yingliang @ 2020-05-02 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tj
Cc: linux-kernel, cgroups, netdev, Libin (Huawei),
yangyingliang, guofan5, wangkefeng.wang
Hi,
I got an oom panic because cgroup is leaked.
Here is the steps :
- run a docker with --cap-add sys_admin parameter and the systemd
process in the docker uses both cgroupv1 and cgroupv2
- ssh/exit from host to docker repeately
I find the number nr_dying_descendants is increasing:
linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep
'^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} +
/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 80
/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1
/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants
1
/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 79
/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants
78
/sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants
78
The situation is as same as the commit bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add
sock->sk_cgroup") describes.
"On mode switch, cgroup references which are already being pointed to by
socks may be leaked."
Do we have a fix for this leak now ?
Or how about fix this by record the cgrp2 pointer, then put it when sk
is freeing like this:
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
index d9bd671105e2..cbb1e76ea305 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
@@ -770,6 +770,7 @@ struct sock_cgroup_data {
#endif
u64 val;
};
+ struct cgroup *cgrpv2;
};
/*
@@ -802,6 +803,7 @@ static inline void sock_cgroup_set_prioidx(struct
sock_cgroup_data *skcd,
return;
if (!(skcd_buf.is_data & 1)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(skcd->cgrpv2, skcd_buf.val);
skcd_buf.val = 0;
skcd_buf.is_data = 1;
}
@@ -819,6 +821,7 @@ static inline void sock_cgroup_set_classid(struct
sock_cgroup_data *skcd,
return;
if (!(skcd_buf.is_data & 1)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(skcd->cgrpv2, skcd_buf.val);
skcd_buf.val = 0;
skcd_buf.is_data = 1;
}
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index a0dda2bf9d7c..7c761ef2d32e 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1520,6 +1520,10 @@ static void sk_prot_free(struct proto *prot,
struct sock *sk)
slab = prot->slab;
cgroup_sk_free(&sk->sk_cgrp_data);
+ if (sk->sk_cgrp_data.cgrpv2) {
+ cgroup_put(sk->sk_cgrp_data.cgrpv2);
+ sk->sk_cgrp_data.cgrpv2 = NULL;
+ }
mem_cgroup_sk_free(sk);
security_sk_free(sk);
if (slab != NULL)
Thanks,
Yang
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch 2020-05-02 10:27 cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch Yang Yingliang @ 2020-05-05 16:06 ` Tejun Heo 2020-05-06 1:50 ` Yang Yingliang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Tejun Heo @ 2020-05-05 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yang Yingliang Cc: linux-kernel, cgroups, netdev, Libin (Huawei), guofan5, wangkefeng.wang Hello, Yang. On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 06:27:21PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: > I find the number nr_dying_descendants is increasing: > linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep > '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 80 > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants > 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 79 > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants > 78 > /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants > 78 Those numbers are nowhere close to causing oom issues. There are some aspects of page and other cache draining which is being improved but unless you're seeing numbers multiple orders of magnitude higher, this isn't the source of your problem. > The situation is as same as the commit bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add > sock->sk_cgroup") describes. > "On mode switch, cgroup references which are already being pointed to by > socks may be leaked." I'm doubtful that you're hitting that issue. Mode switching means memcg being switched between cgroup1 and cgroup2 hierarchies, which is unlikely to be what's happening when you're launching docker containers. The first step would be identifying where memory is going and finding out whether memcg is actually being switched between cgroup1 and 2 - look at the hierarchy number in /proc/cgroups, if that's switching between 0 and someting not zero, it is switching. Thanks. -- tejun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch 2020-05-05 16:06 ` Tejun Heo @ 2020-05-06 1:50 ` Yang Yingliang 2020-05-06 2:16 ` Zefan Li 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Yang Yingliang @ 2020-05-06 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel, cgroups, netdev, Libin (Huawei), guofan5, wangkefeng.wang, lizefan +cc lizefan@huawei.com On 2020/5/6 0:06, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Yang. > > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 06:27:21PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: >> I find the number nr_dying_descendants is increasing: >> linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep >> '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + >> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 80 >> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 >> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >> 1 >> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 79 >> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >> 78 >> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >> 78 > Those numbers are nowhere close to causing oom issues. There are some > aspects of page and other cache draining which is being improved but unless > you're seeing numbers multiple orders of magnitude higher, this isn't the > source of your problem. > >> The situation is as same as the commit bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add >> sock->sk_cgroup") describes. >> "On mode switch, cgroup references which are already being pointed to by >> socks may be leaked." > I'm doubtful that you're hitting that issue. Mode switching means memcg > being switched between cgroup1 and cgroup2 hierarchies, which is unlikely to > be what's happening when you're launching docker containers. > > The first step would be identifying where memory is going and finding out > whether memcg is actually being switched between cgroup1 and 2 - look at the > hierarchy number in /proc/cgroups, if that's switching between 0 and > someting not zero, it is switching. > > Thanks. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch 2020-05-06 1:50 ` Yang Yingliang @ 2020-05-06 2:16 ` Zefan Li 2020-05-06 7:51 ` Zefan Li 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Zefan Li @ 2020-05-06 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yang Yingliang, Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel, cgroups, netdev, Libin (Huawei), guofan5, wangkefeng.wang On 2020/5/6 9:50, Yang Yingliang wrotee: > +cc lizefan@huawei.com > > On 2020/5/6 0:06, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hello, Yang. >> >> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 06:27:21PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: >>> I find the number nr_dying_descendants is increasing: >>> linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep >>> '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + >>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 80 >>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 >>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>> 1 >>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 79 >>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>> 78 >>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>> 78 >> Those numbers are nowhere close to causing oom issues. There are some >> aspects of page and other cache draining which is being improved but unless >> you're seeing numbers multiple orders of magnitude higher, this isn't the >> source of your problem. >> >>> The situation is as same as the commit bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add >>> sock->sk_cgroup") describes. >>> "On mode switch, cgroup references which are already being pointed to by >>> socks may be leaked." >> I'm doubtful that you're hitting that issue. Mode switching means memcg >> being switched between cgroup1 and cgroup2 hierarchies, which is unlikely to >> be what's happening when you're launching docker containers. >> >> The first step would be identifying where memory is going and finding out >> whether memcg is actually being switched between cgroup1 and 2 - look at the >> hierarchy number in /proc/cgroups, if that's switching between 0 and >> someting not zero, it is switching. >> I think there's a bug here which can lead to unlimited memory leak. This should reproduce the bug: # mount -t cgroup -o netprio xxx /cgroup/netprio # mkdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx # echo PID > /cgroup/netprio/xxx/tasks /* this PID process starts to do some network thing and then exits */ # rmdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx /* now this cgroup will never be freed */ Look at the code: static inline void sock_update_netprioidx(struct sock_cgroup_data *skcd) { ... sock_cgroup_set_prioidx(skcd, task_netprioidx(current)); } static inline void sock_cgroup_set_prioidx(struct sock_cgroup_data *skcd, u16 prioidx) { ... if (sock_cgroup_prioidx(&skcd_buf) == prioidx) return ; ... skcd_buf.prioidx = prioidx; WRITE_ONCE(skcd->val, skcd_buf.val); } task_netprioidx() will be the cgrp id of xxx which is not 1, but sock_cgroup_prioidx(&skcd_buf) is 1 because it thought it's in v2 mode. Now we have a memory leak. I think the eastest fix is to do the mode switch here: diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c index b905747..2397866 100644 --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c @@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ static void net_prio_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset) struct task_struct *p; struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; + cgroup_sk_alloc_disable(); + cgroup_taskset_for_each(p, css, tset) { void *v = (void *)(unsigned long)css->cgroup->id; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch 2020-05-06 2:16 ` Zefan Li @ 2020-05-06 7:51 ` Zefan Li 2020-05-09 2:31 ` Yang Yingliang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Zefan Li @ 2020-05-06 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yang Yingliang, Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel, cgroups, netdev, Libin (Huawei), guofan5, wangkefeng.wang On 2020/5/6 10:16, Zefan Li wrote: > On 2020/5/6 9:50, Yang Yingliang wrotee: >> +cc lizefan@huawei.com >> >> On 2020/5/6 0:06, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Hello, Yang. >>> >>> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 06:27:21PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: >>>> I find the number nr_dying_descendants is increasing: >>>> linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep >>>> '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + >>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 80 >>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 >>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>>> 1 >>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 79 >>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>>> 78 >>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>>> 78 >>> Those numbers are nowhere close to causing oom issues. There are some >>> aspects of page and other cache draining which is being improved but unless >>> you're seeing numbers multiple orders of magnitude higher, this isn't the >>> source of your problem. >>> >>>> The situation is as same as the commit bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add >>>> sock->sk_cgroup") describes. >>>> "On mode switch, cgroup references which are already being pointed to by >>>> socks may be leaked." >>> I'm doubtful that you're hitting that issue. Mode switching means memcg >>> being switched between cgroup1 and cgroup2 hierarchies, which is unlikely to >>> be what's happening when you're launching docker containers. >>> >>> The first step would be identifying where memory is going and finding out >>> whether memcg is actually being switched between cgroup1 and 2 - look at the >>> hierarchy number in /proc/cgroups, if that's switching between 0 and >>> someting not zero, it is switching. >>> > > I think there's a bug here which can lead to unlimited memory leak. > This should reproduce the bug: > > # mount -t cgroup -o netprio xxx /cgroup/netprio > # mkdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx > # echo PID > /cgroup/netprio/xxx/tasks > /* this PID process starts to do some network thing and then exits */ > # rmdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx > /* now this cgroup will never be freed */ > Correction (still not tested): # mount -t cgroup2 none /cgroup/v2 # mkdir /cgroup/v2/xxx # echo PID > /cgroup/v2/xxx/cgroup.procs /* this PID process starts to do some network thing */ # mount -t cgroup -o netprio xxx /cgroup/netprio # mkdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx # echo PID > /cgroup/netprio/xxx/tasks ... /* the PID process exits */ rmdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx rmdir /cgroup/v2/xxx /* now looks like this v2 cgroup will never be freed */ > Look at the code: > > static inline void sock_update_netprioidx(struct sock_cgroup_data *skcd) > { > ... > sock_cgroup_set_prioidx(skcd, task_netprioidx(current)); > } > > static inline void sock_cgroup_set_prioidx(struct sock_cgroup_data *skcd, > u16 prioidx) > { > ... > if (sock_cgroup_prioidx(&skcd_buf) == prioidx) > return ; > ... > skcd_buf.prioidx = prioidx; > WRITE_ONCE(skcd->val, skcd_buf.val); > } > > task_netprioidx() will be the cgrp id of xxx which is not 1, but > sock_cgroup_prioidx(&skcd_buf) is 1 because it thought it's in v2 mode. > Now we have a memory leak. > > I think the eastest fix is to do the mode switch here: > > diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c > index b905747..2397866 100644 > --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c > +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c > @@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ static void net_prio_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset) > struct task_struct *p; > struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; > > + cgroup_sk_alloc_disable(); > + > cgroup_taskset_for_each(p, css, tset) { > void *v = (void *)(unsigned long)css->cgroup->id; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch 2020-05-06 7:51 ` Zefan Li @ 2020-05-09 2:31 ` Yang Yingliang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Yang Yingliang @ 2020-05-09 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zefan Li, Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel, cgroups, netdev, Libin (Huawei), guofan5, wangkefeng.wang On 2020/5/6 15:51, Zefan Li wrote: > On 2020/5/6 10:16, Zefan Li wrote: >> On 2020/5/6 9:50, Yang Yingliang wrotee: >>> +cc lizefan@huawei.com >>> >>> On 2020/5/6 0:06, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>> Hello, Yang. >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 06:27:21PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: >>>>> I find the number nr_dying_descendants is increasing: >>>>> linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep >>>>> '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + >>>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 80 >>>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>>>> 1 >>>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>>>> >>>>> 1 >>>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 79 >>>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>>>> >>>>> 78 >>>>> /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/lxc/5f1fdb8c54fa40c3e599613dab6e4815058b76ebada8a27bc1fe80c0d4801764/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants >>>>> >>>>> 78 >>>> Those numbers are nowhere close to causing oom issues. There are some >>>> aspects of page and other cache draining which is being improved >>>> but unless >>>> you're seeing numbers multiple orders of magnitude higher, this >>>> isn't the >>>> source of your problem. >>>> >>>>> The situation is as same as the commit bd1060a1d671 ("sock, >>>>> cgroup: add >>>>> sock->sk_cgroup") describes. >>>>> "On mode switch, cgroup references which are already being pointed >>>>> to by >>>>> socks may be leaked." >>>> I'm doubtful that you're hitting that issue. Mode switching means >>>> memcg >>>> being switched between cgroup1 and cgroup2 hierarchies, which is >>>> unlikely to >>>> be what's happening when you're launching docker containers. >>>> >>>> The first step would be identifying where memory is going and >>>> finding out >>>> whether memcg is actually being switched between cgroup1 and 2 - >>>> look at the >>>> hierarchy number in /proc/cgroups, if that's switching between 0 and >>>> someting not zero, it is switching. >>>> >> >> I think there's a bug here which can lead to unlimited memory leak. >> This should reproduce the bug: >> >> # mount -t cgroup -o netprio xxx /cgroup/netprio >> # mkdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx >> # echo PID > /cgroup/netprio/xxx/tasks >> /* this PID process starts to do some network thing and then >> exits */ >> # rmdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx >> /* now this cgroup will never be freed */ >> > > Correction (still not tested): > > # mount -t cgroup2 none /cgroup/v2 > # mkdir /cgroup/v2/xxx > # echo PID > /cgroup/v2/xxx/cgroup.procs > /* this PID process starts to do some network thing */ > > # mount -t cgroup -o netprio xxx /cgroup/netprio > # mkdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx > # echo PID > /cgroup/netprio/xxx/tasks > ... > /* the PID process exits */ > > rmdir /cgroup/netprio/xxx > rmdir /cgroup/v2/xxx > /* now looks like this v2 cgroup will never be freed */ > >> Look at the code: >> >> static inline void sock_update_netprioidx(struct sock_cgroup_data *skcd) >> { >> ... >> sock_cgroup_set_prioidx(skcd, task_netprioidx(current)); >> } >> >> static inline void sock_cgroup_set_prioidx(struct sock_cgroup_data >> *skcd, >> u16 prioidx) >> { >> ... >> if (sock_cgroup_prioidx(&skcd_buf) == prioidx) >> return ; >> ... >> skcd_buf.prioidx = prioidx; >> WRITE_ONCE(skcd->val, skcd_buf.val); >> } >> >> task_netprioidx() will be the cgrp id of xxx which is not 1, but >> sock_cgroup_prioidx(&skcd_buf) is 1 because it thought it's in v2 mode. >> Now we have a memory leak. >> >> I think the eastest fix is to do the mode switch here: >> >> diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c >> index b905747..2397866 100644 >> --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c >> +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c >> @@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ static void net_prio_attach(struct cgroup_taskset >> *tset) >> struct task_struct *p; >> struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; >> >> + cgroup_sk_alloc_disable(); >> + >> cgroup_taskset_for_each(p, css, tset) { >> void *v = (void *)(unsigned long)css->cgroup->id; > I've do some test with this change, here is the test result: Without this change, nr_dying_descendants is increased and the cgroup is leaked: linux-dVpNUK:~ # mount | grep cgroup tmpfs on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (ro,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755) cgroup2 on /sys/fs/cgroup/unified type cgroup2 (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,nsdelegate) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,name=systemd) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpu,cpuacct) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,net_cls,net_prio) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/devices type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,devices) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/memory type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,memory) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpuset) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,perf_event) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/pids type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,pids) cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/hugetlb type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,hugetlb) linux-dVpNUK:~ # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test linux-dVpNUK:~ # ps -ef | grep bash root 12151 12150 0 00:31 pts/0 00:00:00 -bash root 12322 12321 0 00:31 pts/1 00:00:00 -bash root 12704 12703 0 00:31 pts/2 00:00:00 -bash root 13359 12704 0 00:31 pts/2 00:00:00 grep --color=auto bash linux-dVpNUK:~ # echo 12151 > /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test/tasks linux-dVpNUK:~ # echo 12322 > /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test/tasks (Use bash(12151/12322) do some network things, then kill them, the nr_dying_descendants is increased.) linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 linux-dVpNUK:~ # kill 12151 12322 linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 3 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/user.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/user.slice/user-0.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 (after rmdir test, the nr_dying_descendants is not decreased.) linux-dVpNUK:~ # rmdir /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 3 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/user.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/user.slice/user-0.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 With this change, nr_dying_descendants is not increased: linux-dVpNUK:~ # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test linux-dVpNUK:~ # ps -ef | grep bash root 5466 5443 0 00:50 pts/1 00:00:00 -bash root 5724 5723 0 00:50 pts/2 00:00:00 -bash root 6701 17013 0 00:50 pts/0 00:00:00 grep --color=auto bash root 17013 17012 0 00:46 pts/0 00:00:00 -bash linux-dVpNUK:~ # echo 5466 > /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test/tasks linux-dVpNUK:~ # echo 5724 > /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test/tasks linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 linux-dVpNUK:~ # kill 5466 5724 linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 linux-dVpNUK:~ # rmdir /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio/test/ linux-dVpNUK:~ # find /sys/fs/cgroup/ -name cgroup.stat -exec grep '^nr_dying_descendants [^0]' {} + /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/system.slice/system-hostos.slice/cgroup.stat:nr_dying_descendants 1 > . ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-09 2:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-05-02 10:27 cgroup pointed by sock is leaked on mode switch Yang Yingliang 2020-05-05 16:06 ` Tejun Heo 2020-05-06 1:50 ` Yang Yingliang 2020-05-06 2:16 ` Zefan Li 2020-05-06 7:51 ` Zefan Li 2020-05-09 2:31 ` Yang Yingliang
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.