From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EEEC33CB1 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA47B222C3 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729588AbgAOJyb (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:54:31 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:9618 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729504AbgAOJya (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:54:30 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 79DE1587D749E023B9B4; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:54:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:54:23 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH -next] f2fs: remove set but not used variable 'cs_block' To: Shinichiro Kawasaki , Yuehaibing CC: "jaegeuk@kernel.org" , "chao@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" References: <20191224124359.15040-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <673efe18-d528-2e9b-6d44-a6a7a22086f3@huawei.com> <62ce1981-9061-f798-a65d-9599ceceb4b8@huawei.com> <20191226082419.ljbhystwkhp2d4gh@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com> <20200115023328.bummaaa7pdnao5qk@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <0aea7754-2114-cc78-3453-bc608bacd45a@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:54:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200115023328.bummaaa7pdnao5qk@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/1/15 10:33, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote: > On Dec 26, 2019 / 17:24, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote: >> On Dec 26, 2019 / 14:05, Yuehaibing wrote: >>> On 2019/12/26 11:44, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2019/12/24 20:43, YueHaibing wrote: >>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c: In function fix_curseg_write_pointer: >>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c:4485:35: warning: variable cs_block set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >>>>> >>>>> It is never used since commit 362d8a920384 ("f2fs: Check >>>>> write pointer consistency of open zones") , so remove it. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the fix! >>>> >>>> Do you mind merging this patch to original patch? as it's still >>>> pending in dev branch. >>> >>> It's ok for me. >>> >> >> Thank you for this catch and the fix. Appreciated. > > I have merged YueHaibing's change to the write pointer consistency fix patch > and sent out as the v6 series. Thanks again for finding out the unused variable. > > I was not sure if I should add Chao Yu's reviewed by tag to the patch from which > the unused variable was removed. To be strict, I didn't add the tag. Just > another quick review by Chao will be appreciated. Thanks for the revision. :) I guess Jaegeuk can merge that kind of fix into original patch, and meanwhile keeping old Reviewed-by tag in that patch. Thanks, > > -- > Best Regards, > Shin'ichiro Kawasaki. > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2EEC33CB1 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C04D24679 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="A5OhOIpK"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="lTtR0JsS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4C04D24679 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1irfNv-0000v5-Ls; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:54:47 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1irfNs-0000uM-OC for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:54:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iUFNXolgudU1gu/h+pwY0lt0MT1f5oHmI644MRTPzpc=; b=A5OhOIpKedIZb2oLD2qa2iaoN+ BxQvZonXUYPbu8ESyxOh88ANSzUv52swJDYJh76hnIf0MNIuGmXIfmqy1k/gIimSuXwNQnmLmwPMd zr/PdaKqvtHkW4+E69jFqo8NXlw+3gQ8FMEqW71If5PJRChlGcT3Bw/QmHa05Lply6k4=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iUFNXolgudU1gu/h+pwY0lt0MT1f5oHmI644MRTPzpc=; b=lTtR0JsSOXiYg/dJM8mnFCdW5g V4fbcE/sfbER/8Iu/HOcig2LsdsRHA1Ye4rkiW+jusyJ/ZTGlah2FIhkIvHNXXHEi2cILE4cQrZMU rHHG9zkHIA4mBeS2rdfr1oc0ec4dJAKPpkDckmaCv4rVQozkji3cGwlQcU6tMiqsMHj0=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1irfNp-006yQz-4U for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:54:44 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 79DE1587D749E023B9B4; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:54:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:54:23 +0800 To: Shinichiro Kawasaki , Yuehaibing References: <20191224124359.15040-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <673efe18-d528-2e9b-6d44-a6a7a22086f3@huawei.com> <62ce1981-9061-f798-a65d-9599ceceb4b8@huawei.com> <20191226082419.ljbhystwkhp2d4gh@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com> <20200115023328.bummaaa7pdnao5qk@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <0aea7754-2114-cc78-3453-bc608bacd45a@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:54:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200115023328.bummaaa7pdnao5qk@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1irfNp-006yQz-4U Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH -next] f2fs: remove set but not used variable 'cs_block' X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "jaegeuk@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/1/15 10:33, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote: > On Dec 26, 2019 / 17:24, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote: >> On Dec 26, 2019 / 14:05, Yuehaibing wrote: >>> On 2019/12/26 11:44, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2019/12/24 20:43, YueHaibing wrote: >>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c: In function fix_curseg_write_pointer: >>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c:4485:35: warning: variable cs_block set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >>>>> >>>>> It is never used since commit 362d8a920384 ("f2fs: Check >>>>> write pointer consistency of open zones") , so remove it. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the fix! >>>> >>>> Do you mind merging this patch to original patch? as it's still >>>> pending in dev branch. >>> >>> It's ok for me. >>> >> >> Thank you for this catch and the fix. Appreciated. > > I have merged YueHaibing's change to the write pointer consistency fix patch > and sent out as the v6 series. Thanks again for finding out the unused variable. > > I was not sure if I should add Chao Yu's reviewed by tag to the patch from which > the unused variable was removed. To be strict, I didn't add the tag. Just > another quick review by Chao will be appreciated. Thanks for the revision. :) I guess Jaegeuk can merge that kind of fix into original patch, and meanwhile keeping old Reviewed-by tag in that patch. Thanks, > > -- > Best Regards, > Shin'ichiro Kawasaki. > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel