From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABD671BE5 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2017 05:14:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,364,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="173690610" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2017 05:14:23 -0800 To: Neal Gompa References: <20171018121423.1310-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <264c9619-62e7-ef43-9412-f00e9a1028ba@linux.intel.com> <634edf6c-23d9-1dbf-6c51-caef2f30c06f@windriver.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <0afcb034-1acf-3a4b-b27a-010b7073a308@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:14:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Mark Wielaard , OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpm: update to 4.14.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:14:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/07/2017 11:17 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> Thanks, this is the offending commit: >> >> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/88989572fff1f31e0c4f972a6895585e4742ef4b >> >> Looks like they added sophisticated in-place processing/rewriting of the >> actual binary (that is not possible to switch off). And it fails in case of >> grub modules. >> >> We, on the other hand, only need to extract the list of debug source code >> files. Any hint on how to do that without the use of rpm/debugedit? Perhaps >> something from binutils/elfutils? >> > > This is the first time I'm hearing of this. Has anyone talked to Mark > Wielaard (CC'd to this email) about fixing this properly for you guys? We don't have any particular interest in debugedit though. It is only used as a crutch to extract the debug source locations. If readelf can do the same thing, we'll use that - please do understand that reporting issues upstream costs time, especially if upstream replies with NEEDINFO, WORKSFORME or WONTFIX type of thing, so we prioritize what's truly critical :) Alex