On 6/18/21 10:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:42:13PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master >> head: e71e3a48a7e89fa71fb70bf4602367528864d2ff >> commit: 56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32 [5946/11253] memory: tegra: Enable compile testing for all drivers >> config: x86_64-randconfig-c002-20210618 (attached as .config) >> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0 >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): >> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32 >> git remote add linux-next https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git >> git fetch --no-tags linux-next master >> git checkout 56ebc9b0d77e0406aba2d900c82e79204cc7dc32 >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> make W=1 ARCH=x86_64 > What is it about this failure that makes the lkp bot think that linux-mm > is an appropriate cc? It seems to get cc'd on all kinds of random bugs, > and I'm never quite sure why. > Hi Matthew, We hard coded two polices: 1. If Andrew Morton involved in the commit, we will cc linux-mm 2. If the problem repo is linux-next, we will cc linux-mm to archive these reports for a summary report (some developers want to read the original report): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/609ebb8a.MY4vWDkFI93n9l1s%25lkp@intel.com/ Do you want us to adjust the polices? Best Regards, Rong Chen