From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95641C56201 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBDC2076E for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726466AbgKLHF6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:05:58 -0500 Received: from www84.your-server.de ([213.133.104.84]:47384 "EHLO www84.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725898AbgKLHF5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:05:57 -0500 Received: from ipbcc25655.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([188.194.86.85] helo=[192.168.0.7]) by www84.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1kd6fw-00053Q-Ns; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:05:44 +0100 Message-ID: <0b58872b4f27dbf5aad2a39f5ec4a066e080d806.camel@seibold.net> Subject: Re: pci_alloc_irq_vectors fails ENOSPC for XPS 13 9310 From: Stefani Seibold To: wi nk Cc: Kalle Valo , Thomas Krause , Govind Singh , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Devin Bayer , Christoph Hellwig , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:05:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20201103160838.GA246433@bjorn-Precision-5520> <874km61732.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87mtzxkus5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wnz0hr9k.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87ft5hehlb.fsf@codeaurora.org> <6b60c8f1-ec37-d601-92c2-97a485b73431@posteo.de> <87v9ec9rk3.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87imab4slq.fsf@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: stefani@seibold.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.4/25985/Wed Nov 11 14:18:01 2020) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2020, 02:10 +0100 schrieb wi nk: > I've yet to see any instability after 45 minutes of exercising it, I > do see a couple of messages that came out of the driver: > > [ 8.963389] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x16005 > [ 11.342317] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x1d00a > > then when it associates: > > [ 16.718895] wlp85s0: send auth to ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) > [ 16.722636] wlp85s0: authenticated > [ 16.724150] wlp85s0: associate with ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) > [ 16.726486] wlp85s0: RX AssocResp from ec:08:6b:27:01:ea > (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=8) > [ 16.738443] wlp85s0: associated > [ 16.764966] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlp85s0: link becomes > ready > > The adapter is achieving around 500 mbps on my gigabit connection, my > 2018 mbp sees around 650, so it's doing pretty well so far. > > Stefani - when you applied the patch that Kalle shared, which branch > did you apply it to? I applied it to ath11k-qca6390-bringup and when > I revert 7fef431be9c9 there is a small merge conflict I needed to > resolve. I wonder if either the starting branch, or your chosen > resolution are related to the instability you see (or I'm just lucky > so far! :)). > I used the vanilla kernel tree https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-5.10-rc2.tar.gz. On top of this i applied the RFT-ath11k-pci-support-platforms-with-one-MSI-vector.patch and reverted the patch 7fef431be9c9 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from www84.your-server.de ([213.133.104.84]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kd6g2-0003p5-Ry for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:05:51 +0000 Message-ID: <0b58872b4f27dbf5aad2a39f5ec4a066e080d806.camel@seibold.net> Subject: Re: pci_alloc_irq_vectors fails ENOSPC for XPS 13 9310 From: Stefani Seibold Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:05:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20201103160838.GA246433@bjorn-Precision-5520> <874km61732.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87mtzxkus5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wnz0hr9k.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87ft5hehlb.fsf@codeaurora.org> <6b60c8f1-ec37-d601-92c2-97a485b73431@posteo.de> <87v9ec9rk3.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87imab4slq.fsf@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: wi nk Cc: Govind Singh , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Devin Bayer , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Krause , Bjorn Helgaas , David Woodhouse , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig , Kalle Valo Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2020, 02:10 +0100 schrieb wi nk: > I've yet to see any instability after 45 minutes of exercising it, I > do see a couple of messages that came out of the driver: > > [ 8.963389] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x16005 > [ 11.342317] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x1d00a > > then when it associates: > > [ 16.718895] wlp85s0: send auth to ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) > [ 16.722636] wlp85s0: authenticated > [ 16.724150] wlp85s0: associate with ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) > [ 16.726486] wlp85s0: RX AssocResp from ec:08:6b:27:01:ea > (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=8) > [ 16.738443] wlp85s0: associated > [ 16.764966] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlp85s0: link becomes > ready > > The adapter is achieving around 500 mbps on my gigabit connection, my > 2018 mbp sees around 650, so it's doing pretty well so far. > > Stefani - when you applied the patch that Kalle shared, which branch > did you apply it to? I applied it to ath11k-qca6390-bringup and when > I revert 7fef431be9c9 there is a small merge conflict I needed to > resolve. I wonder if either the starting branch, or your chosen > resolution are related to the instability you see (or I'm just lucky > so far! :)). > I used the vanilla kernel tree https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-5.10-rc2.tar.gz. On top of this i applied the RFT-ath11k-pci-support-platforms-with-one-MSI-vector.patch and reverted the patch 7fef431be9c9 -- ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k