From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392DEC433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAF64613DE for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:51:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DAF64613DE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4cK-0001W2-SB for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:51:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4aq-0008Hs-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:49:32 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:24018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4ao-0007Fa-Vc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:49:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1621601370; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FEpsemIRGu5oOuQUZUwUiVUxbSGPmrzNuO7HnUiioZE=; b=G19A7poLKEXqbchH2ZLlQuL3VQE+UbgPhU+vmBLqKkUCUM7YVhLie9iLyHIrFQA5BJlLZp 3iEyRm+Yxwgt6oWQpCIX1YIX32Y62yuluwGrj3K19g5KA1jCZ+HGKu1bb70PX+NmR6WOaT 004VkO+o0MuYMwDBcG5HVjmO6hYA6Iw= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-13--RcaCAovNxGxe0xGQ_tkoQ-1; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:49:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -RcaCAovNxGxe0xGQ_tkoQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id l185-20020a1c25c20000b029014b0624775eso3776252wml.6 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 05:49:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FEpsemIRGu5oOuQUZUwUiVUxbSGPmrzNuO7HnUiioZE=; b=f6ZEAE0s49ddyNVFz/th4Wv4KNyl4xN7b7Oxputnrb8IEfSz655P/2pNmjcVvTTMXU eQwPo/SAY/9knvgOAn3fDyhJDsvEusf0DJqJenvxS8sIxPUQ/c9dYMX0ZocvskzFpe/B fb6bxJe1ScAB7+SdE06uhncsPIAgHQ7L1X/t425uMboMJC5d2qNvSKMlEqGs3YjqZ9fn wlEP1JK2sjT1pc4SifUSzz690YYlxtnEzNAuyzofG7VOYqdY7Ftk+1lwLzJrkWJkqzKz HOIw2GINElphPMNkTdIEFcciY+odSqWuCcLTWQjosQ4eup70C9OwbAqhiK0uYh04U/s3 /Xkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OBC30N72I30AtKobYoQw05lFwJpT0YWRdvXWdJXzTSJ/fRuog dgSxK8CuEKPZIN/FMm3RDuQLE7+jpwe9zpaitGc15+aLO0q7hIpL260ZBjSSqT8a3i2zqcccL+Q DAzWwm80ttvap5ZU= X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb82:: with SMTP id t2mr9464096wrn.337.1621601365875; Fri, 21 May 2021 05:49:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw73pAFTOSndpcd8E3sbpG2oAHoeGXpWLGEU356+4L0WWV9IP9DroFeowKVGzzVsIKhTUprBA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb82:: with SMTP id t2mr9464082wrn.337.1621601365750; Fri, 21 May 2021 05:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (31.red-83-51-215.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.51.215.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m6sm10672246wml.3.2021.05.21.05.49.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 May 2021 05:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] acceptance tests: rename acceptance to system To: Thomas Huth , Willian Rampazzo References: <20210520195322.205691-1-willianr@redhat.com> <20210520195322.205691-2-willianr@redhat.com> <0f4a1c6c-ddba-ae57-2d55-f59c478dc9c5@redhat.com> <943fcdae-168a-adf8-c82b-b1a88369441c@redhat.com> <82f5ed3f-3047-bfa3-c7b2-d91300f393f8@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <0b970add-1804-f841-819d-e77a64d616e8@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:49:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <82f5ed3f-3047-bfa3-c7b2-d91300f393f8@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=philmd@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.374, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Niek Linnenbank , qemu-arm , Michael Rolnik , Cleber Rosa , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 5/21/21 2:42 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 21/05/2021 14.28, Willian Rampazzo wrote: >> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:16 AM Thomas Huth wrote: > [...] >>> Alternatively, what about renaming the "acceptance" tests to >>> "validation" >>> instead? That word does not have a duplicated definition in the >>> context of >>> QEMU yet, so I think it would be less confusing. >> >> While at the beginning of your reply, I started thinking if >> "validation" would cause less confusion for the QEMU project. Although >> validation testing is a broader concept inside the Verification & >> Validation process, encompassing unit testing, functional testing, >> integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing, it may be >> an option for the QEMU project. >> >> While system testing would be the correct terminology to use, if it >> causes more confusion, using a less strict terminology, like >> validation testing, is valid, in my opinion. > > > Or we could come up with a new, artificial name instead (like "qtests"). > It certainly need a "q" in the name. For example what about: > > - avoqado +1 for 'make check-avoqado' :)