From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f175.google.com (mail-pg1-f175.google.com [209.85.215.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052282C81 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-f175.google.com with SMTP id q5so22385543pgr.7 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yLLt3e/byhfnA3P9vYh4lwELyiVLYNoimcBiOUKcrRE=; b=RquRfgyOGeib0ca2Z/YjgegK69hav2TBTjmWGTBheo0YtuutzaH+X8I3qX2dpxwt16 ECz/BBVbYNroENCsJ2Ji2m6troWA01+lJpLVY5FA1a22P8GVVAWaxHIaWGHQOXIpv5ED GhcWfBHyJTEhTXmP5kedV9a2lJQe8E1T+F3NXeiBlsnJPSKIgg7ybrYtV8r5Whi2mAZo pxdKroL7NZYegHY/BEqaMOfgRjr6jz69J2/AqosDDTYCtsjwQKQJWZ803oElDFT65wew JQ2ckDEZwUKIFh3otsMx17GGshpxO8ly7zQr5dgFSVaR4kd9hw+glUj3/YHPtt//kIOS 1iFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yLLt3e/byhfnA3P9vYh4lwELyiVLYNoimcBiOUKcrRE=; b=EpoetYvZxs6lxx55zPjvb35LHTkAzUqGrQTWkaKQlavftE2VB/2DysToLQru/eKIv4 uO1OoLRwysqT6xqNtkLe37p0PGwe5ImWsOlW0TjionM5+RJKyuAp81pSVzpCTcpu+YHr 9y2gAk6BluxC66/oEtP2LwBA2HII0Db9vo5OXd9IZ1NdY4jdrmEYEayBEFBzLuLAO/V0 ZMVxKnD5c8FqiRKjnxxhxnvOCGTcjCkUE15aHpZEE/YQzhvIgqbLP/LFTD8DGDZvRQWi gM/J8WaVgB6OGxHXGILqLVhDR+bVnuQ+UwVUHQ5QmX0t6pJPt4IvH1HxbSnZ0XxhmiSq nb2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DPKy3q7wZHj8GrOFWtTBq7/0yMLV5sPfhkSiD17bBWF2QClz5 n8+/1dpkXf88KhGZZpfq91A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyatyAg66w2KX3N/f5vc+UL7u5a7Snbw7Li8BUt/uAO1d8+05kAjI+4qsi3T3h1SANzIJ9VJg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:9215:0:b0:44c:4de1:f777 with SMTP id o21-20020a629215000000b0044c4de1f777mr6121848pfd.31.1634733362287; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2400:4052:6980:3800:dba7:2b1f:3f26:a5ec? ([2400:4052:6980:3800:dba7:2b1f:3f26:a5ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e10sm2205396pgt.23.2021.10.20.05.35.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0c3447632fb43b3d390f09c9588d2478a9bbfb1b.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [BUG 0/5] bug reports for atomisp to make it work From: Tsuchiya Yuto To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Hans de Goede , Patrik Gfeller , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Arnd Bergmann , Kaixu Xia , Dan Carpenter , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:35:57 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20211020074836.42476792@sal.lan> References: <20211017162337.44860-1-kitakar@gmail.com> <20211020074836.42476792@sal.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 07:48 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Mon, 18 Oct 2021 01:23:31 +0900 > Tsuchiya Yuto escreveu: > > > Hi all, > > > > These mails contain RFC patches, which are almost bug report and some > > are just bug report, for atomisp to work (again). Tested on Microsoft > > Surface 3 (Windows) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 (Android model) with v5.15-rc5. > > Both are Cherry Trail (ISP2401) devices. > > Before start looking at the patches, let me check if I got it right: > > Should this series be applied after the series you sent earlier[1]? > > [1] The series which starts with this one: > [PATCH 00/17] various fixes for atomisp to make it work Hi, thank you for looking into this. This series (RFC patches and BUG reports) does not depend on the series I sent earlier ("various fixes for atomisp to make it work"). So, these bugs here can be looked into anytime. Especially, the bug that causes NULL pointer dereference on some setup ("[BUG/RFC PATCH 3/5] [BUG][RFC] media: atomisp: pci: add NULL check for asd obtained from atomisp_video_pipe") is somewhat a critical issue and it'd be great if it's fixed in a proper way as soon as possible. Regards, Tsuchiya Yuto