From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: "Matheus K. Ferst" <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Cc: laurent@vivier.eu, groug@kaod.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] linux-user/ppc: Fix XER access in save/restore_user_regs
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:24:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c4c402c-e9e3-f1da-2550-b28c8200a7aa@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7925af5a-e8c4-0574-c131-4e86e8a0252c@eldorado.org.br>
On 10/15/21 7:54 AM, Matheus K. Ferst wrote:
>> While Appendix B does guarantee that "0" is and always will be an invalid instruction, I
>> wonder if the test itself would be clearer (i.e. self-documenting the intent) using
>> SIGTRAP and "trap".
>>
>>
>> r~
>
> It would be better, but cpu_loop is currently calling cpu_abort for POWERPC_EXCP_TRAP, so
> the test would fail. I'll see if I can fix that in another patch, and then we can change
> the test to use trap.
Fair enough.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-14 22:32 [PATCH 0/4] Fix incorrect accesses to XER matheus.ferst
2021-10-14 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] linux-user/ppc: Fix XER access in save/restore_user_regs matheus.ferst
2021-10-14 23:43 ` Richard Henderson
2021-10-15 14:54 ` Matheus K. Ferst
2021-10-15 18:24 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2021-10-15 0:30 ` David Gibson
2021-10-14 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] target/ppc: Fix XER access in gdbstub matheus.ferst
2021-10-14 23:43 ` Richard Henderson
2021-10-15 0:31 ` David Gibson
2021-10-14 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] linux-user: Fix XER access in ppc version of elf_core_copy_regs matheus.ferst
2021-10-14 23:44 ` Richard Henderson
2021-10-14 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] target/ppc: Fix XER access in monitor matheus.ferst
2021-10-14 23:45 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c4c402c-e9e3-f1da-2550-b28c8200a7aa@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.