From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:35124 "EHLO
        mail-it0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S933471AbcIALZX (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:25:23 -0400
Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e124so96326573ith.0
        for <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 04:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Recommendation on raid5 drive error resolution
To: Gareth Pye <gareth@cerberos.id.au>, Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
References: <CA+WRLO8KuP8LS77NUbZLAs3e120oFudES_R3tYQjjYiCXH4BOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJCQCtSUVeXwuKn8rR_Rw24anzHNSLgVo_wYkot1mZYXiGkJ1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+WRLO_6q2cZqPPkmtqjjkq7tfdh5DDyE_oHFswFoQVz8FguKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+WRLO8XVaK5FK9VUt=pOgoyqYm30_yxTnCd+5zdYx5Xx6jAcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+WRLO-cvepjj53xCoq=RiEmTV-6cqL+G6nQe+WnTPyWNDOUZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+WRLO-1oJLZ56EivVTg=bycNhfpOt8ovLrLbgnNeCVKgvbxhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJCQCtQddXz26cjp=tGcO5d5E9N=Zmjdd=qwonjGdh+NJ7aLQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJCQCtRGpAgGq9dpv432ES9OUHG4fDkt+DviapaCyg0Jtc2gVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+WRLO8kTBoPHx3jkeN+zdygEMZz9ejTeWGwQireRtDGDNrncQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+WRLO-WwM8hN9OxWZfbac60iXDZ8=WZ8=fokKdCqYcSpEdu6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+WRLO9ZazygSMfLjpfXO_bYMmJVecd3be44EKJWMDORFXiVKg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0cad7942-096c-1ea4-bf31-a4e959bcc4f8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:25:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+WRLO9ZazygSMfLjpfXO_bYMmJVecd3be44EKJWMDORFXiVKg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 2016-08-31 19:04, Gareth Pye wrote:
> ro,degraded has mounted it nicely and my rsync of the more useful data
> is progressing at the speed of WiFi.
>
> There are repeated read errors from one drive still but the rsync
> hasn't bailed yet, which I think means there isn't any overlapping
> errors in any of the files it has touched thus far. Am I right or is
> their likely to be corrupt data in the files I've synced off?
Unless you've been running with nocow or nodatasum in your mount 
options, then what you've concluded should be correct.  I would still 
suggest verifying the data by some external means if possible, this type 
of situation is not something that's well tested, and TBH I'm amazed 
that things are working to the degree that they are.
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Gareth Pye <gareth@cerberos.id.au> wrote:
>> Or I could just once again select the right boot device in the bios. I
>> think I want some new hardware :)
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Gareth Pye <gareth@cerberos.id.au> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> wrote:
>>>> But I'd try a newer kernel before you
>>>> give up on it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any recommendations on liveCDs that have recent kernels & btrfs tools?
>>> For no apparent reason system isn't booting normally either, and I'm
>>> reluctant to fix that before at least confirming the things I at least
>>> partially care about have a recent backup.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gareth Pye - blog.cerberos.id.au
>>> Level 2 MTG Judge, Melbourne, Australia
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gareth Pye - blog.cerberos.id.au
>> Level 2 MTG Judge, Melbourne, Australia
>
>
>