All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:08:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dadfe48-d92f-4a54-1590-3aa4b5fbc1aa@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97db1c4b-bc9e-9db0-424d-6cd3ba348e78@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3190 bytes --]

On 11/29/19 1:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 29/11/2019 10.47, Janosch Frank wrote:
> [...]
>> Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
>> 3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.
> 
> So if 8-10 are not valid in protected mode...
> 
>> @@ -59,6 +61,9 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
>>  #define DIAG308_LOAD_NORMAL_DUMP    4
>>  #define DIAG308_SET                 5
>>  #define DIAG308_STORE               6
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_SET              8
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_STORE            9
>> +#define DIAG308_PV_START            10
>>  
>>  static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
>>                                uintptr_t ra, bool write)
>> @@ -105,6 +110,7 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>>          s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_REIPL);
>>          break;
>>      case DIAG308_SET:
>> +    case DIAG308_PV_SET:
> 
> ... should you maybe add a check here (and the other cases) to make sure
> that the guest is currently not running in PV mode? Or is this taken
> care of by the Ultravisor already?

The Ultravisor takes care of that.

> 
>>          if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, false)) {
>>              return;
>>          }
>> @@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>>  
>>          cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>>  
>> -        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb)) {
>> +        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
>> +            !(iplb_valid_se(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_comp(iplb) >= 0)) {
>>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
>>              goto out;
>>          }
>> @@ -128,10 +135,15 @@ out:
>>          g_free(iplb);
>>          return;
>>      case DIAG308_STORE:
>> +    case DIAG308_PV_STORE:
>>          if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
>>              return;
>>          }
>> -        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
>> +        if (subcode == DIAG308_PV_STORE) {
>> +            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
>> +        } else {
>> +            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
>> +        }
>>          if (iplb) {
>>              cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
>> @@ -139,6 +151,16 @@ out:
>>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
>>          }
>>          return;
>> +        break;
> 
> Please remove the break. Or the return. But let's not do both.

Right, I forgot to remove that...

> 
>> +    case DIAG308_PV_START:
>> +        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
>> +        if (!iplb_valid_se(iplb)) {
>> +            env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF;
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_PV);
>> +        break;
>>      default:
>>          s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
>>          break;
>>
> 
>  Thomas
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29  9:47 [PATCH v2 00/13] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:18     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:41       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 12:40   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 14:08     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-12-02  9:20       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] Header sync protvirt Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 10:48   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:32     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-04 11:34       ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:46         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] s390x: protvirt: Add pv state to cpu env Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:22     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:50     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-05 17:15   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-05 17:34     ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-05 17:46       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  7:44         ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  8:29           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  8:45             ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06  9:08               ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06  9:30                 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:15     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:21     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:24       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 11:58   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 12:44     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] s390x: Exit on vcpu reset error Janosch Frank
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 12:16   ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-05 17:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29  9:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:04   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 11:08     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0dadfe48-d92f-4a54-1590-3aa4b5fbc1aa@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.