From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3368C433EC for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2206619F6 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233072AbhCWP7I (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:59:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40090 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232987AbhCWP64 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:58:56 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D65C0C061763 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id z3so18223574ioc.8 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:58:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NO3WLs2vlBKiTCA7DRRz2cdPr87od0vVxyebRQ/JakY=; b=f3vd+CopGTvevG8pEPkv8DeH4ALqoBzv+RVf1kXcnba6/+sTCctXQaaEajrj65fhwt YXE+hqZsMzbd7Yxmx5VTJjZTE06KKiIvUiQHe+w6iWx6OMzp5AvvHRYthPBm9WZ9HaQ3 eysHTBCuabELRxnBPUwc/voVKA+FVDO5TF2zBD8Vj8x+JdV8Aso8ZoAoRsA07BE2uxYh zvqKXXFOa5DiqI8/G1tdpKKmpAVGz/8RHhBbnJ2sQW+05MzkqADVLsR3qGRmP2yBZzPz DLHy4U+rDB/Ou+AD70UYuLc/4YAWm2UpYr2c59+dQ+8q7LRjYC5BwEMIjs6r/UWzZCM5 fL5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NO3WLs2vlBKiTCA7DRRz2cdPr87od0vVxyebRQ/JakY=; b=YUJltuGXNG27hLFltLRMmKuRdoonx1SxJSserwFEPr7Y8IimS9hf5bqY6rEj9Cuzn8 2HsojwRJYCN9BZ4Sy3M+xa2DC1pMuS95qIiwHGYsyQkyaL6v5I0Tj+6qNaoXRrGVVNCC dessdvWK3FU1pBd7eAZzEAP8ZtTBggBzvRlKe6d4DdZdgIlQbQKyqcZ/FX1FBOiEa7Pm aCGggeebP6Vn7yvnssr83mBu8L4NJX69rgl2x8I1a+5dcdnoNyQVde8dRiRtQoS2tWoj +Rj5wnVn0oI416QJVk05OlzabIZM4vkuDvm4LyxhQC4w+DztWpUlTUvHMtV7ggRVW5Jn 2ZWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jnnoQ+lmJ4uMSZgNBPx66ZpEZHmIgf1IckLqDyhdUvkyIcVQJ HPKd8ZA3PmfLxC84FwZ79zQEtAenShKm9A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfcaCYU4OYAne4TbFTL8+80cuww4d05IMpb+sAobc+HNYDfnEuWSXybld8Ezbi8ZjwEU4QvA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:f11:: with SMTP id h17mr5233398jas.67.1616515135123; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n7sm9895823ile.12.2021.03.23.08.58.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: clear GD_NEED_PART_SCAN later in bdev_disk_changed To: chris.chiu@canonical.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210323085219.24428-1-chris.chiu@canonical.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <0ec65a30-741d-9f22-e90b-1f72f68b4346@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:58:54 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210323085219.24428-1-chris.chiu@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/23/21 2:52 AM, chris.chiu@canonical.com wrote: > From: Chris Chiu > > The GD_NEED_PART_SCAN is set by bdev_check_media_change to initiate > a partition scan while removing a block device. It should be cleared > after blk_drop_paritions because blk_drop_paritions could return > -EBUSY and then the consequence __blkdev_get has no chance to do > delete_partition if GD_NEED_PART_SCAN already cleared. > > It causes some problems on some card readers. Ex. Realtek card > reader 0bda:0328 and 0bda:0158. The device node of the partition > will not disappear after the memory card removed. Thus the user > applications can not update the device mapping correctly. Applied, thanks. -- Jens Axboe