From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCF860557 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 09:48:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jun 2018 02:48:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,490,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="235474087" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2018 02:48:29 -0700 To: Andrej Valek , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" References: <20180607072501.27158-1-andrej.valek@siemens.com> <20180607073209.27240-1-andrej.valek@siemens.com> <59452b23-7470-588c-75fb-7445aaa13ba1@linux.intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <0edc5efa-5836-2b76-7af1-a4261a345e56@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 12:48:52 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] feat(openssl-1.1): rework packaging X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 09:48:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/08/2018 10:48 AM, Andrej Valek wrote: > after more testing, I think creating ${sysconfdir}/ssl links is highly > recommended. ca-certificate updating script (+ many other tools) has > hard-coded path to /etc/ssl. Debian has multiple links in /usr/lib/ssl/ > to /etc/ssl/. Right. Can you explain this in a comment in the recipe itself, and make the change as a separate commit please? > c_rehash was not working on target exactly as on native. (Same perl > erros). So I have copied this stuff from 1.0.2, it is working on both > platforms as well. Can you however try to look deeper into why it fails on target? For the target, I would much rather use the upstream's version than our custom script, so we don't have to deal with bit-rot and extra maintenance. The custom script then would only have a limited, controlled purpose of running under bitbake. Alex