RE: [PATCH v2 RFC 1/9] wifi: rtw88: Clear RTW_FLAG_POWERON early in rtw_mac_power_switch()

[Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 4:08 AM
> To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>; Kalle Valo
> <kvalo@kernel.org>; Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@gmail.com>; Nitin Gupta
> <nitin.gupta981@gmail.com>; Neo Jou <neojou@gmail.com>; Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RFC 1/9] wifi: rtw88: Clear RTW_FLAG_POWERON early in rtw_mac_power_switch()
> 
> Hello Ping-Ke,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 3:29 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > +       if (!pwr_on)
> > > +               clear_bit(RTW_FLAG_POWERON, rtwdev->flags);
> > > +
> > >         pwr_seq = pwr_on ? chip->pwr_on_seq : chip->pwr_off_seq;
> > >         ret = rtw_pwr_seq_parser(rtwdev, pwr_seq);
> > >         if (ret)
> >
> > This patch changes the behavior if rtw_pwr_seq_parser() returns error while
> > doing power-off, but I dig and think further about this case hardware stays in
> > abnormal state. I think it would be fine to see this state as POWER_OFF.
> > Do you agree this as well?
> I agree with you. Also I think I should have made it clearer in the
> description of the patch that I'm potentially changing the behavior
> (and that this is not an issue in my opinion).
> If there's any problem during the power on/off sequence then we can't
> be fully sure about the power state.
> If you have any suggestions how to improve this then please let me know.
> 

No more suggestion for now. Just apply your thought. 

Ping-Ke