From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD412C432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 14:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E96161056 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 14:34:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6E96161056 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRKI-0003wa-N5 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:34:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRIw-0002QO-2j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:33:32 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:45829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRIs-0002hP-Ei for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:33:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630506804; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R07ssJ6evm393rirbJSSDK68ddIueLAWdMxKkaPBhLA=; b=TUjxJ4kPsCXM9cajRPXPHrvWp32RnAmUUI3eyg3sThJPFcYhibhHkakHjPt35TevBT7U4p /X7E0mzwYVg0W2gSy1BcEjk8H7kS0aVxsrin4zXtm1VYr5Bu+Kn1CcJXRlN04hQfcYlc12 CyTuuVcv6E9TPy2ctlrlNNmUWvAM/uA= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-195-WkZuVYUhP_K21JeFanXKEg-1; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:33:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WkZuVYUhP_K21JeFanXKEg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id b126-20020a1c8084000000b002f152a868a2so2115823wmd.1 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 07:33:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=R07ssJ6evm393rirbJSSDK68ddIueLAWdMxKkaPBhLA=; b=eJpwy2ejBavuIFDhoYnfH1ApfklQLXOMeB9oUZ09vyiPgdl2uLloY5v6yadBEFXBM3 6GO2UM5upRs/iWPNP+tRxzHJaTIw40fz35yPVhvFN9qEPEPB5FfdBmEOhrRV5HMt5uSs GCzIl0sWwWAjvFTYdPpFC1HnqM3tN6TK4Dra/XXO5U7jh4bFLCnTybv1uXrRshOCqGEe 0ioduGAzUbykEdvjH2snO58qNsf0obBH2DkxzRAazHgOOo2DcCMVsR5JWMvArbCgOMPr T3xl0sq46hwB2GZ+vFhzFaiGH7Pqg8sMJApfqgf+13X/gNgmAp5nTUvLmVtmf/vQsy2N s3dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Iwbyz0aB1HLaUUazbUJ+D8/ZwI+p35afsF2XlUH7tw9Jc5BqL LsdOsX2yXZO4FwTve1JE+5Zj6SbyTMPF+j/wXj4tUhfxSxklYz8eP8QoBkiwSPjrAtbuEDppvFz WHmeaRT5Zrje7pPI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:db07:: with SMTP id s7mr39103561wri.106.1630506801093; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 07:33:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8s3tEVpZWPZuQAVJvteYgLAftq7r6bGRprmH+GhIHfFsdClrcaBZyV2fk6Q5ftwP1PHD03g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:db07:: with SMTP id s7mr39103538wri.106.1630506800919; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 07:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dresden.str.redhat.com ([2a02:908:1e46:160:b272:8083:d5:bc7d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm5521088wrg.14.2021.09.01.07.33.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 07:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] iotests/297: Cover tests/ To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-block@nongnu.org References: <20210514154351.629027-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <7260b639-c50b-c758-0e60-2e36acae35b0@virtuozzo.com> From: Hanna Reitz Message-ID: <0fa5d384-23b6-c370-c124-490a1b200b5c@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:33:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7260b639-c50b-c758-0e60-2e36acae35b0@virtuozzo.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=hreitz@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=hreitz@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.392, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.029, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 01.09.21 15:34, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > A kind of ping:) > > Seems that never landed into master? Yes, that’s true… I was waiting for John (CC-ed) to send v3 of https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-07/msg00611.html, because in https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-07/msg00611.html, John was proposing to have it include these patches here. But I guess there was no plan to change the patches (other than correcting the comment in patch 3), so I suppose I might as well. (And it seems like John has other things going on, so I don’t want to exert pressure by waiting for a v3 with these patches O:)) But I think I do have to send v4, because of that comment.  I suppose there can be no harm in doing so.  (And now I really wonder why I haven’t done so all this time...) Hanna