From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754052AbcJDQBf (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:01:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54248 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752005AbcJDQBc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:01:32 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20161003.020236.1905952240188445872.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20161003.020236.1905952240188445872.davem@davemloft.net> <147527161156.28826.2148784664652062075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: David Miller Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <10082.1475596890.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:01:30 +0100 Message-ID: <10083.1475596890@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, What's the procedure for sending more fixes at this point? Do I send them against net-next, since net doesn't contain the things to be fixed yet, or do I wait for net to catch up? David