From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Csaba Henk Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:12:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1011159141.22473140.1425478320272.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <54F31D28.9050103@bisect.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx6-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.39]:41694 "EHLO mx6-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758468AbbCDOMG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:12:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54F31D28.9050103@bisect.de> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Danny Al-Gaaf Hi Danny, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Danny Al-Gaaf" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , > ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org > Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 3:07:36 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila ... > For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The first > solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS via p9 and > NFS would not perform that well I guess). The second solution, to use Can you please explain that why does the Ganesha based stack involve 9p? (Maybe I miss something basic, but I don't know.) Cheers Csaba