From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:44:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:44:29 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:61432 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 06:44:28 -0400 Subject: Re: reiserfsprogs release From: Alan Cox To: Vitaly Fertman Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200208121442.19656.vitaly@namesys.com> References: <200206251829.25799.vitaly@namesys.com> <200206261317.10813.vitaly@namesys.com> <200207101206.48370.vitaly@namesys.com> <200208121442.19656.vitaly@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 12 Aug 2002 13:09:45 +0100 Message-Id: <1029154185.16421.161.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 11:42, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > > Hi all, > > a critical bug was fixed in reiserfsck journal replay process, > so we decided to release a new 3.6.3 progs with just 2 bug > fixes related to it. What version does reiserfsck in this report. That way I can update CHANGES to indicate the 3.6.3 bits are required. Right now it says 3.x.1b - should it now say 3.6.3 ?