From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S938908AbcJXOjK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:39:10 -0400
Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:54972 "EHLO
        youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752234AbcJXOjJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:39:09 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
References: <1477054150-4772-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <alpine.LRH.2.20.1610241539590.7014@namei.org>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Organization: Canonical
Message-ID: <10305c6c-2793-f03f-a93a-fafc4a3acb01@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:39:03 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1610241539590.7014@namei.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 10/23/2016 09:44 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> 
>>   (1) CaitSith can use both string / numeric arguments (like TOMOYO and
>>       AppArmor) and security labels (like SELinux and Smack). There is no
>>       reason that access control implementation must not use both.
>>
> 
> I believe that AppArmor will be gaining more support for security labels.
> 
> JJ: is that correct?
> 
yes, it will