From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mrk3.michaelranft.com (kt1.mrdt.eu [46.38.238.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 20:53:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Ranft Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 20:53:31 +0200 Message-ID: <10470392.gzTFYexBx8@asciix220ii> In-Reply-To: <1837457.4z7jiftR4i@asciix220ii> References: <56ff45f7-021b-4e0d-1c6a-0163beb1faa8@gmail.com> <1837457.4z7jiftR4i@asciix220ii> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] sane distro-installer options for cryptsetup was: Mildly OT: LUKS and the Debian installer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2018 18:21:06 CEST Michael Ranft wrote: > On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2018 01:18:55 CEST Diagon wrote: > > On 05/22/2018 12:58 PM, Michael Ranft - m@michaelranft.com wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Michael - I found the solution, which works on both Debian and Devuan. > > I was given some kind help by someone on the Debian user's list, which I > > am copying here: > > [...] > > > > So, to explain my process for anyone who comes this way ... > > > > [...] > > > The installer options for dm-crypt in De[vu,bi]an seem a bit outdated, or > at least not the standard dm-crypt is providing. > The maintainer is hopefully aware of that. I mean the installers' maintainer('s) ... even this is normally not the place to ask for and just a rhethorical question here, sorry for OT. Cannot speak for up-to-date-debian, wheezy was my last one. > I would really like to know what others (esp. Arno and Milan) would > recommend to use as a mnimum for a today's new installation (in a distro's > installer), may it be plain or LUKS[2]. Nevertheless I'd like to hear about minimal recommendations of dm-crypt-folks in new installs. Michael