From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:11:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:11:34 -0500 Received: from spc1.esa.lanl.gov ([128.165.67.191]:20864 "EHLO spc1.esa.lanl.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:11:32 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2 From: "Steven P. Cole" Reply-To: elenstev@mesatop.com To: Robert Love Cc: jjs , linux kernel In-Reply-To: <1048115072.775.108.camel@phantasy.awol.org> References: <20030319012115.466970fd.akpm@digeo.com> <1048103489.1962.87.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030319121055.685b9b8c.akpm@digeo.com> <1048107434.1743.12.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> <1048111359.1807.13.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> <3E78EC63.9050308@tmsusa.com> <1048114307.1511.12.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> <1048115072.775.108.camel@phantasy.awol.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1048115944.1510.16.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2-1mdk Date: 19 Mar 2003 16:19:04 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 16:04, Robert Love wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:51, Steven P. Cole wrote: > > > I'll try the different value of max_timeslice with dbench on > > reiserfs next. That's where the lack of response was most evident. > > I am curious as to whether reverting sched-D4 fixes this. > > If not, the first step is seeing whether this is a bad decision made by > the interactivity estimator. Something like: > > ps -eo pid,nice,priority,command > > for dbench, evolution, and X might be useful. > > Thanks, > > Robert Love > In the meantime, Andrew has asked me to revert the sched-D3 patch. I'm recompiling now, and will only have time for that test before I have to go do other things. Steven