From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com [213.105.254.86]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06167482A for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:05:33 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk (dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h6BF2rKd020899; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:02:54 +0100 Received: (from alan@localhost) by dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6BF2pCj020897; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:02:51 +0100 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [2.5] ns87415 irq From: Alan Cox To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , HPPA List In-Reply-To: <20030711140732.GA20424@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20030711140732.GA20424@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1057935770.20636.22.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 11 Jul 2003 16:02:50 +0100 Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Gwe, 2003-07-11 at 15:07, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Would this patch make sense for 2.5? I have to confess not testing it > on any hardware, but it seems to be the Right Thing (and I'm sure Alan > remembers the mess we had in the 2.4 parisc tree for this ...) Yes, it makes sense to do this generally. However can you also pass hwif to the ide_default_irq function because that lets the arch code work out what pci bus the device is nailed to