From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266792AbTGOHaJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:30:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266798AbTGOHaJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:30:09 -0400 Received: from AMarseille-201-1-2-223.w193-253.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.253.217.223]:47911 "EHLO gaston") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266792AbTGOHaF (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:30:05 -0400 Subject: Re: radeonfb patch for 2.4.22... From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: ajoshi@kernel.crashing.org, lkml In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1058255052.620.2.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 15 Jul 2003 09:44:13 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > Which is what the original 0.1.8 patch included, his fixes were included. > > Ah really? I though that his changes were not merged in your 0.1.8 patch. > > So can I just revert his patch and accept your instead that all of his > stuff is in ? Whoaa, great. No. 0.1.8 lacks a lot of my stuffs > I prefer playing no silly games in the 2.4 stable series, as I've been > trying to do so far. If you had accepted Ben's changes in the first place > I wouldnt need to apply his patch. > > Ben is very interested in maintaining the driver, AFAIK. Is that > correct, Ben? > > Are you interested in giving up maintenance? > > For me it doenst matter who maintains the driver, as long as it is well > maintained. I could take over if Ani wants to give up, though I would prefer a dedicated maintainer with more time to do the necessary rewrite of this driver in 2.6 and later, which I don't have time to do right now, however, I can maintain the existing code base if necessary. Ben.