From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270432AbTGSA37 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:29:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270448AbTGSA37 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:29:59 -0400 Received: from mail.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.67]:38103 "HELO mail.skjellin.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S270432AbTGSA35 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:29:57 -0400 Subject: Re: libata driver update posted From: Andre Tomt To: azarah@gentoo.org Cc: Jeff Garzik , Catalin BOIE , Linux Kernel Mailing List , SCSI Mailing List , Vojtech Pavlik In-Reply-To: <1058574616.1834.24.camel@nosferatu.lan> References: <3F1711C8.6040207@pobox.com> <3F17F28C.9050105@pobox.com> <1058542771.13515.1599.camel@workshop.saharacpt.lan> <20030718154322.GB27152@gtf.org> <1058574616.1834.24.camel@nosferatu.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1058575500.3407.103.camel@slurv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 19 Jul 2003 02:45:01 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On l?, 2003-07-19 at 02:30, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 17:43, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > How is performance compared to the default driver for the ICH5 SATA ? > > > > I haven't done any comparisons because the "default driver" just flat > > out doesn't work for me. > > > > However, if performance is lower, then I consider that a bug. > > > > Question if you do not mind me being a tad lazy - in ZA SCSI is damn > expensive, so not much experience ... is there something like hdparm -t > to check throughput ? hdparm -t works on scsi too. and md, and, well, any block device? :-) -- Cheers, André Tomt andre@tomt.net From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Tomt Subject: Re: libata driver update posted Date: 19 Jul 2003 02:45:01 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1058575500.3407.103.camel@slurv> References: <3F1711C8.6040207@pobox.com> <3F17F28C.9050105@pobox.com> <1058542771.13515.1599.camel@workshop.saharacpt.lan> <20030718154322.GB27152@gtf.org> <1058574616.1834.24.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.67]:38359 "HELO mail.skjellin.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S270447AbTGSA35 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:29:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1058574616.1834.24.camel@nosferatu.lan> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: azarah@gentoo.org Cc: Jeff Garzik , Catalin BOIE , Linux Kernel Mailing List , SCSI Mailing List , Vojtech Pavlik On l?, 2003-07-19 at 02:30, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 17:43, Jeff Garzik wrote: >=20 > > > How is performance compared to the default driver for the ICH5 SA= TA ? > >=20 > > I haven't done any comparisons because the "default driver" just fl= at > > out doesn't work for me. > >=20 > > However, if performance is lower, then I consider that a bug. > >=20 >=20 > Question if you do not mind me being a tad lazy - in ZA SCSI is damn > expensive, so not much experience ... is there something like hdparm = -t > to check throughput ? hdparm -t works on scsi too. and md, and, well, any block device? :-) --=20 Cheers, Andr=E9 Tomt andre@tomt.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html