From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270045AbTGSMym (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:54:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270048AbTGSMym (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:54:42 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:16859 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270045AbTGSMym (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:54:42 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem From: Alan Cox To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: James Simmons , Amit Shah , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1058620026.22005.0.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 19 Jul 2003 14:07:07 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sad, 2003-07-19 at 07:02, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > No, that's not so simple, because vesafb requests the linear frame buffer, > while vga16fb requests the VGA region. In standard usage mode both of them use the vga registers for palette control..