From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263871AbTJEUHi (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:07:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263872AbTJEUHi (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:07:38 -0400 Received: from imladris.demon.co.uk ([193.237.130.41]:25748 "EHLO imladris.demon.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263871AbTJEUHg (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:07:36 -0400 From: David Woodhouse To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20031005191344.GA963@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1065266733.16088.91.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> <20031005161155.GA753@elf.ucw.cz> <20031005171916.B21478@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20031005191344.GA963@elf.ucw.cz> Message-Id: <1065384453.3157.149.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-2.dwmw2.3) Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 21:07:33 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dwmw2@infradead.org Subject: Re: JFFS2 swsusp / signal cleanup. Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.0+cvs (built Mon Aug 18 15:53:30 BST 2003) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 21:13 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Should I do recalc_sigpending() instead of flush_signals(current)? Yes. You can do that unconditionally, too -- no need to do it depending on an argument from the caller. -- dwmw2