From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Benoit Subject: Re: Re: File System shootout... Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:15:47 -0700 Message-ID: <1066166147.29222.177.camel@mikeb.staff.netnation.com> References: <1239031.1065786947952.JavaMail.nobody@franzjosef> Reply-To: mikeb@netnation.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1239031.1065786947952.JavaMail.nobody@franzjosef> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= Cc: Nikita@Namesys.COM, Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 04:55, Dieter N=FCtzel wrote: > > Mike Benoit writes: > > > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchma= rks > > > I've been running over the last week between all the major file syst= ems > > > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. = More > > > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they > > > come in.=20 > > >=20 > > > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of= each of the > > > different file systems strengths and weaknesses. > > >=20 > > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/ > >=20 > > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ result= s > > for reiser4 vs. ext3: > >=20 > > on the box with 128M of ram: >=20 > Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/= writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3? >=20 Do you have a link to the 2.6.0-test5+ data-logging patch?=20 > Greetings, > Dieter --=20 Best Regards, =20 Mike Benoit NetNation Communications Inc. Systems Engineer Tel: 604-684-6892 or 888-983-6600 --------------------------------------- =20 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are my own and not=20 necessarily those of my employer