From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263376AbTLXCch (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:32:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263378AbTLXCch (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:32:37 -0500 Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu ([129.10.116.51]:51918 "EHLO amber.ccs.neu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263376AbTLXCcf (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:32:35 -0500 Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev From: Stan Bubrouski To: Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1072232566.3826.8.camel@fur> References: <1072232566.3826.8.camel@fur> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072233153.2947.171.camel@duergar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:32:35 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 21:22, Rob Love wrote: > On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 21:21, Ian Kent wrote: > > > I understand your view but my point here (at this stage) is not > > necessarily to revive devfs development but to provide some maintenance > > only support for those that need it during the (what appears to be > > inevitable) transition. In particular, keeping it around while people > > still need it. > > > > My mother always said I was deaf. > > Well, good luck to you :) > > Do not say no one warned you! > Do you think Linus would even accept patches for this? I'm just curious, are bugfixes still going into it at all? -sb > Rob Love > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >