From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christophe Saout Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:44:10 +0000 Subject: Re: IGNORE method Message-Id: <1073731450.6584.3.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> List-Id: References: <20040110013128.GA2112@vrfy.org> In-Reply-To: <20040110013128.GA2112@vrfy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org Am Sa, den 10.01.2004 schrieb Greg KH um 02:35: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 02:31:28AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > > http://linuxusb.bkbits.net:8080/udev/cset@1.395?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-2d > > > > We have a IGNORE rule now? > > Yeah, Christophe sent me a patch for one. > > > I would prefer a change that simply allows NAME="". > > That works with every other method, not only kernel names and is much > > much simpler. > > Ah. Yeah, that might be a lot simpler. Something like (in your new > syntax): > KERNEL="dm-[0-9]*", NAME="" > > It's not the most intuitive, but I could live with it. Christophe, what > do you think? Sure, I thought of this too. I added the IGNORE rule because it's more intuitive but if this is more flexible, I'm ok with it. You should be aware that this would also ignore an additional SYMLINK. Should I update my patch or add one on top of it that drops the new rule? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel