From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed enhancements to MD
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:57:38 +0100
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1074247058.4434.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
References: <40033D02.8000207@adaptec.com> <40043C75.6040100@pobox.com>
	 <20040113134107.A7646@lists.us.dell.com>
	 <20040116093120.GH22417@marowsky-bree.de>
Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7afQEDI97XKKLBcPtXFa"
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040116093120.GH22417@marowsky-bree.de>
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Scott Long <scott_long@adaptec.com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids


--=-7afQEDI97XKKLBcPtXFa
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 10:31, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-01-13T13:41:07,
>    Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> said:
>=20
> > > You sorta hit a bad time for 2.4 development.  Even though my employe=
r=20
> > > (Red Hat), Adaptec, and many others must continue to support new=20
> > > products on 2.4.x kernels,
> > Indeed, enterprise class products based on 2.4.x kernels will need
> > some form of solution here too.
>=20
> Yes, namely not supporting this feature and moving onwards to 2.6 in
> their next release ;-)

hear hear


--=-7afQEDI97XKKLBcPtXFa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAB7WRxULwo51rQBIRAhy4AJ4u9LY979em5HJLASaH7CVj5r+3ugCgjRTJ
1NgkLP+B3W2IaHt0sB5RrbQ=
=M0Y6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-7afQEDI97XKKLBcPtXFa--