From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: multiple separate pci bridges ... From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= To: Sven Luther Cc: linuxppc-dev list In-Reply-To: <20040119141623.GA21373@iliana> References: <20040118144412.GA6897@iliana> <1074443601.9704.164.camel@thor.asgaard.local> <20040119134831.GA21093@iliana> <1074520948.9700.248.camel@thor.asgaard.local> <20040119141623.GA21373@iliana> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1074522687.16178.258.camel@thor.asgaard.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:31:28 +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 15:16, Sven Luther wrote: > BTW, is it time to move this thread to the dri-devel list or something ? It wouldn't be really on topic there either, so maybe just take it off list? > With radeon it does work. I believe this is because the ati module > lacks knowledge about the 5964 to choose the submodule ? Right, I forgot to merge that. > That said, DRI doesn't work, because it lacks the 9200SE recognition > code, i suppose. Should it be ok to apply the same patch that was posted > on the debian-x list to your dri-trunk package also ? RV280 chips should be treated correctly AFAICT. How does it fail? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/