All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: "'Borislav Petkov'" <bp@alien8.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:57:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <107ab804c8f44a9fba4cb52a60ee1f0d@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315181612.GH27816@pd.tnic>

From: Borislav Petkov
> Sent: 15 March 2018 18:16
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:10:54PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > I liked OPCODE_BUFSIZE where it was before :-)  Here it disrupts the
> > readability of the function a bit IMO.
> 
> My thinking is have it close by so that you don't have to go search for
> its definition.
> 
> But I don't have a strong opinion on where it should be so...

Is OPCODE_BUFSIZE even needed?
Maybe replace with 64 and use sizeof() and/or ARRAY_SIZE() elsewhere.
Then no one has to check that the bound is appropriate for the array.

	David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-16 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-15 15:44 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v2 Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/dumstack: Remove code_bytes Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:12   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/dumpstack: Unexport oops_begin() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/dumpstack: Carve out Code: dumping into a function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:10   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:16     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 19:06       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 11:57       ` David Laight [this message]
2018-03-15 18:19   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:23   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/dumpstack: Add loglevel argument to show_opcodes() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/fault: Dump user opcode bytes on fatal faults Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/dumpstack: Add a show_ip() function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:34   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 19:01   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 11:48     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 12:01       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 12:11         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 13:16           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 13:44             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 17:22       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-16 17:40         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 17:45         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 18:38           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/dumpstack: Explain the reasoning for the prologue and buffer size Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:07   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:17     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v2 Linus Torvalds
2018-04-17 14:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 20:16     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-17 21:06       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-18 13:26         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-17 16:11 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v3 Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=107ab804c8f44a9fba4cb52a60ee1f0d@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.