All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.12?
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:45:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1084620000.1118346308@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563780000.1118292280@[10.10.2.4]>

> Now what's REALLY, REALLY wierd is that this fixes my hang problem
> whilst trying to run kernbench:
> 
> http://mbligh.org/abat/no_hang
> 
> which is just reverting:
> 
> x86_64-use-a-common-function-to-find-code-segment-bases-fix.patch
> 
> But the patch is tiny, and it makes NO sense at all for this to fix
> anything. All it does is:


Strangely, -git3 works, which has the boot fix applied, but not the
hang fix bit. Something odd is afoot.
 
> diff -purN -X /home/mbligh/.diff.exclude 2.6.12-rc2-mm2/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h 2.6.12-rc2-mm2-no_hang/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h
> --- 2.6.12-rc2-mm2/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h	2005-04-08 23:41:41.000000000 -0700
> +++ 2.6.12-rc2-mm2-no_hang/include/asm-x86_64/ptrace.h	2005-06-08 16:25:01.000000000 -0700
> @@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ struct pt_regs {
>  extern unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  void signal_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, void __user *frame, char *where);
>  
> -struct task_struct;
> -
>  extern unsigned long
>  convert_rip_to_linear(struct task_struct *child, struct pt_regs *regs);
> 
> 
> How the hell can that possibly fix it? Boggle. But it does. I checked.
> I ran a whole damned sequence of patches from your tree against the box,
> then extracted the one where the failover started and retested it with
> just that and the no_hole one. There's even a little green box to 
> prove it about 4 down on the left here:
> 
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/regression_matrix.html
> 
> My brain is now a small piece of silly-putty smushed against the far
> wall of my study. Anything you can do to help me scrape up the remains
> would be splendid. I can only speculate it's some wierd side-effect,
> because I have no other explaination at all.
> 
> Humpf.
> 
> M.



  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-09 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-03 22:24 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-03 23:37 ` 2.6.12? Francois Romieu
2005-06-04  8:36   ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 11:33     ` 2.6.12? Francois Romieu
2005-06-04 20:59       ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-03 23:38 ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-03 23:55   ` 2.6.12? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04  0:05     ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-06 10:56     ` 2.6.12? Takashi Iwai
2005-06-04  0:01   ` 2.6.12? Wakko Warner
2005-06-04  0:51     ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-04  0:03   ` 2.6.12? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-04  1:19     ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-04  0:05   ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-04  1:21     ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-07 14:43       ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-07 15:53         ` 2.6.12? Sylvain Meyer
2005-06-08  8:02           ` 2.6.12? Brice Goglin
2005-06-04  0:34   ` 2.6.12? Dave Jones
2005-06-04  1:50     ` 2.6.12? Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-04  8:15   ` 2.6.12? Russell King
2005-06-04  9:25   ` 2.6.12? Johannes Stezenbach
2005-06-04 12:25   ` 2.6.12? Michael Krufky
2005-06-04 14:23   ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-04 14:35     ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-04 15:24       ` 2.6.12? Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-06-04 22:11     ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-05 15:02       ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-07 18:16         ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-07 19:24           ` 2.6.12? Andrew Morton
2005-06-08 12:56             ` 2.6.12? Andi Kleen
2005-06-08 19:47               ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-08 23:04                 ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-09  4:44                   ` 2.6.12? Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-09 19:45                     ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2005-06-09 13:41                   ` 2.6.12? Andi Kleen
2005-06-06 22:06   ` 2.6.12? Adam Belay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1084620000.1118346308@flay \
    --to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.