From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S267347AbUHDQeu@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267347AbUHDQeu (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:34:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267351AbUHDQet
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:34:49 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:48103 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267347AbUHDQ1x (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:27:53 -0400
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.8-rc3
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
       Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
       Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
       Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens@endorphin.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040804161046.GD19282@fieldses.org>
References: <4110FB0E.230CE613@users.sourceforge.net>
	 <Xine.LNX.4.44.0408041156310.9291-100000@dhcp83-76.boston.redhat.com>
	 <20040804161046.GD19282@fieldses.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LRgjwNc7KcFuN5pfNbQV"
Organization: Red Hat UK
Message-Id: <1091636850.2792.19.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:27:30 +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--=-LRgjwNc7KcFuN5pfNbQV
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> relicense under 3-clause BSD under BSD or GPL anyway.  So, unless I'm
> missing something, the "or GPL" probably doesn't do anything more than
> make explicit something that was allowed already.

not entirely; in a dual license scheme one has the freedom to ignore one
of the two licenses and also to place derived work only under the one
chosen. That and it's outright rude to take someone else's code and
relicense it.


--=-LRgjwNc7KcFuN5pfNbQV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBEQ5yxULwo51rQBIRAsFmAJ4nU4COkwSzwjjvr3+LuPLlDmqqbQCcDkE/
F8tYiWC273ERTf5Qp9C44Ks=
=fBXV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-LRgjwNc7KcFuN5pfNbQV--