From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/11] tracepoint: introduce kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1095960167.1226.1522166963714.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20180327024706.2064725-1-ast@fb.com> <20180327024706.2064725-8-ast@fb.com> <20180327100711.0ec7aafb@gandalf.local.home> <1566743692.1117.1522160304471.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20180327104242.3594bcac@gandalf.local.home> <8600dbae-389d-dd01-f003-44f1af7dcf0a@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rostedt , "David S. Miller" , Daniel Borkmann , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , netdev , kernel-team , linux-api To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Received: from mail.efficios.com ([167.114.142.138]:52788 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753004AbeC0QLh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:11:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8600dbae-389d-dd01-f003-44f1af7dcf0a@fb.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ----- On Mar 27, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Alexei Starovoitov ast@fb.com wrote: > On 3/27/18 7:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:18:24 -0400 (EDT) >> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> >>> ----- On Mar 27, 2018, at 10:07 AM, rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:47:02 -0700 >>>> Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Alexei Starovoitov >>>>> >>>>> introduce kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name() helper to let bpf core >>>>> find tracepoint by name and later attach bpf probe to a tracepoint >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) >>> >>> Steven showed preference for tracepoint_kernel_find_by_name() at some >>> point (starting with a tracepoint_ prefix). I'm find with either of >>> the names. >> >> Yeah, I do prefer tracepoint_kernel_find_by_name() to stay consistent >> with the other tracepoint functions. But we have >> "for_each_kernel_tracepoint()" and not "for_each_tracepoint_kernel()", >> thus we need to pick being consistent with one or the other. One answer >> is to use tracpoint_kernel_find_by_name() and rename the for_each to >> for_each_tracpoint_kernel(). > > yep. that's exactly the reason I picked kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name() > to match for_each_kernel_tracepoint() naming. > > I can certainly send a follow up patch to rename both to > *tracepoint_kernel* and then you can nack it because it breaks lttng :) If Steven prefers changing the name of for_each_kernel_tracepoint() to for_each_tracepoint_kernel(), I'll adapt LTTng accordingly. I don't mind either way, as long as the change is justified. Thanks, Mathieu > but let's do it in a separate thread. > > Daniel, > do you mind adding { } as Steven requested while applying or > you want me to resubmit the whole thing? > > Thanks! -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com