From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270254AbUJTB27 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:28:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269225AbUJTBVH (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:21:07 -0400 Received: from sophie.6s.nl ([82.192.75.250]:24037 "EHLO sophie.6s.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270270AbUJTBRB (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:17:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.9 and GPL Buyout From: Bastiaan Spandaw To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <41757478.4090402@drdos.com> References: <417550FB.8020404@drdos.com> <1098218286.8675.82.camel@mentorng.gurulabs.com> <41757478.4090402@drdos.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098235014.8126.34.camel@louise3.6s.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:16:55 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 22:09, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > >>JFS, XFS, All SMP support in Linux, and RCU. > And Numa also. > > >This isn't SCO code. This goes back to SCO's claims of "control rights" > >over any source code that has been in the same room as UNIX code. > No. They seem to have some factual concrete evidence IP covered under > Employee agreements was used and subsequently converted into Linux, and they > are very confident of this. bwhahaha... nice try.. Do you reallly think you (on your own) can defend al those claims? (better than all lawyers/persons involved???!?!?!) Even though all of them (claims) have been disputed by people more knowledgeable than you? Please leave LKML. We don't like you nor anything you have to say. Not sincerely, Bastiaan Spandaw