From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CgS2J-0002sU-CE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:13:35 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CgS2I-0002rj-Ax
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:13:34 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CgS2I-0002rY-6q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:13:34 -0500
Received: from [216.254.0.204] (helo=mail4.speakeasy.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1CgRrY-0000h7-B9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:02:29 -0500
Subject: Re: Removing GCC dependency, was Re: [Qemu-devel] get_func() hangs
	with gcc 3.4.2 on MinGW and WinXP host
From: "John R. Hogerhuis" <jhoger@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412201614270.6637@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <20041215134754.GA28410@100tka.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0412151515170.16529@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<20041215145903.GA29957@100tka.net>
	<20041215234503.GA12778@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0412160049320.18774@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<20041217195627.A38776@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0412180107140.30351@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<20041218040428.GA31934@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0412181558250.32234@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<1103404056.21895.83.camel@aragorn>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0412191525350.3165@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<1103524011.18528.834.camel@aragorn>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0412201614270.6637@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1103565756.18531.838.camel@aragorn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:02:36 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: jhoger@pobox.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 07:16, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Wow, that was a detailed explanation. I do understand your points now. I
> guess that the path QEmu takes will be the path that the first one writing
> a proof-of-concept takes...

Well I thought I'd put the idea out there for discussion. The path QEMU
takes will be whichever one Fabrice decides is best, of course.

-- John.