From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261604AbVFBHv3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 03:51:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261608AbVFBHv3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 03:51:29 -0400 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:35731 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261604AbVFBHvT (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 03:51:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Accessing monotonic clock from modules From: Robert Love To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Mikael Starvik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1117698518.6458.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <1117697423.6458.18.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1117698045.6833.16.camel@jenny.boston.ximian.com> <1117698518.6458.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 03:52:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1117698764.6833.26.camel@jenny.boston.ximian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 09:48 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > agreed. > > well maybe it doesn't have such a name since it isn't intended as such > interface.... That was the root of my concern; if the interface is more of a "do" function, maybe we need something cleaner as the officially exported interface? With, of course, a better name. ;-) I do thing that this is useful, though--at GUADEC I talked with some folks who really want to get at a good clock source, the same from both the kernel and user-space. Robert Love