From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "McMullan, Jason" Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-daemon server Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:09:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1117814982.32257.64.camel@jmcmullan.timesys> References: <20050603152212.GA4598@jmcmullan.timesys> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-ccEZcXxAjfS26gmddEE1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "Git Mailing List" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 03 18:09:28 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DeEh1-0003UO-Ia for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:06:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261310AbVFCQJu (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:09:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261334AbVFCQJu (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:09:50 -0400 Received: from mail.timesys.com ([65.117.135.102]:60805 "EHLO exchange.timesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261310AbVFCQJo (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:09:44 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Received: from jmcmullan by owa.timesys.com; 03 Jun 2005 12:09:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4-3mdk Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4-3mdk Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:02:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1117814982.32257.64.camel@jmcmullan.timesys> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH] git-daemon server thread-index: AcVoVbHMF6NxEXf0Rc+ZsXOqNOoIAg== To: "Linus Torvalds" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --=-ccEZcXxAjfS26gmddEE1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 09:02 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > ie it wouldn't be a deamon at all, it would be a foreground server. So I'= d=20 > call it just "git-server" or something. Server.. Sounds ok. Will do. > Anyway, technically this looks ok, but I'd hate to apply it until there i= s=20 > something that actually uses it and an example of that usage. Well, I use it to keep my home and work repos in sync, but yeah, users =3D=3D 1 doesn't make a good case for inclusion. I just want to have this out there, because I find rsync a little too heavy handed for my taste, and I'm still hesitant about the cg-rpush locking semantics. --=20 Jason McMullan TimeSys Corporation --=-ccEZcXxAjfS26gmddEE1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCoIDF8/0vJ5szK6kRAiWZAJ0adIAKQvf33dJHyWMXNmH44lIPRACdF8HD DOy+foYBWK0hTtUVmJkf/RM= =1LLL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ccEZcXxAjfS26gmddEE1--